Agantuk : Director of Directors “Satyajit Ray” says Adieu to the audience !
“Agantuk” is the last “cinematic discourse” of the Satyajit Ray, who got realisation in the medium of cinema. His cinema is never superficial and even his lightest film carries several levels of undertone. He was a fantastic writer also and its not a somewhat strange fact that he created his cinema on the pattern of a good literature only. The satisfaction and deep meaning we get through good literature, same meanings and learning we find in/through Satyajit Ray’s films.
He is not only a technical director who knows how to mix up 1 and 99 to make a film having 100 departments rather he was master in every department of film making. His films work on psychological levels. They dig human being, humanity, evolution of humanity, relationships and in that way they help in understanding the human life as anthropology does.
What a way he chose to say good bye to his audience!!!!! In that way, the protagonist played by “Utpal Dutt” is just a shadow or say an alter ego of Ray himself. Through the character of Utpal Dutt, Ray himself is addressing the world.
If one has to see how to narrate a story with minimum number of characters and how to bring before audience a great visual tale which covers great aspects of humanity then Ray’s cinema comes in to the existence.
His interest is the man, its relationships and growth of humanity. Ray deals on psychology of human being as a character also and as collective growth of humanity also. Ray is an observer of psychological, sociological, political, and anthropological growth (or movement) of man. He has dealt with every possible area of human life. Childhood, youth and old age all have got representation in his films.
His cinema enriches our own exposure towards humanity and it makes us believe that we are humans. His cinema is while still at the nucleus and yet movement is there at the surface. There is no hurry in showing any thing in his cinema and everything comes so naturally on screen. His cinema is all about fine nuances. Whatever he covers he covers it with deep understanding about the subject he is dealing with. Many times we feel, while watching his films, what the hell, we also see these things in real life but how come he makes them appear so beautiful and appealing on screen? Often simple is extraordinary in his cinema.
* * * *
Local is global and global can also be local. Ancient can be more modern and sometimes modern can be more older than known ancient in understanding.
We are the world. We humans make the world. We are crowd but still we are individuals also.
But being individual does not mean that only I, we and ours are the right things. There exist things different than us. There have been existing things, far better than ours, understandings better than ours, creations better than ours since the time immemorial. This is different thing we don’t know about them or we are ignorant about them or our ego does not allow us to see and accept that people can be better than us and their things can be better than ours.
Gandhi ji said “Keep your doors and windows open and get ideas from everywhere but do not get blown off by any one of them”.
Tagore said something similar “Keep your windows open. Let the winds come in. Know how to imbibe them.”
Satyajit Ray also tries to explore the above mentioned philosophy propagated by Gandhi and Tagore in their times through their ideas and literature. Ray always propagated middle path through his films and literature and he never propagated any kind of fanaticism be it ideological or philosophical and his liberal attitude shines best through his last directed film Agantuk, which is a multi-layered philosophical film. Satyajit Ray has always been a scientist of social studies while making films or creating literature. He writes his own scripts and through these scripts he not only covers contemporary themes but at same time he encompasses the areas which have been affecting humanity as such. His films seem to be based on simple themes but they always cover a vast horizon and all of a sudden a local thing may strike on a globally relevant area. Ray does his research thoroughly before start making his film and hence his films are complete in any field. They don’t carry nonsense attitude. Music will be present at those places where its required most and where things cant be expressed without music. Background music will not produce any noise rather it will emboss further the effect of the scene. And background music will be totally absent where its not required or where complete silence is needed. Natural touch is the most basic element in his films. His cinema is not about “above human characters” and they all are fallible. His characters are taken from real lives.
The philosophy of “Atithi Devo Bhavah (Guest is like the God) “ was installed in the Hindus way of life by old scriptures and through sayings of Sages. This centuries old saying establishes the importance of the unknown. Word “Atithi” is not limited to human being only but it has vast meaning and any unknown coming in to life, unknown which is imparted by Nature to man’s life, comes under the word “Atithi”. Whatever comes on its own in our lives is atithi, which is not known before. Sutra says that accept the unknown, naturally came to us, and live without any conflict in your life. Live without any fight with the new arrival as that refusal will make life simply a battle field where there will not be even minute place for relaxed state of mind which is necessary to be constructive. We Human being can’t win over nature as we are too short, too small, too tiny in all terms before the vast and continuously expanding Nature.
We human don’t know what is hidden behind anything happening in our lives. This unknown or guest may give us unexpected while leaving us. Love comes in the life unexpectedly, rather everything or say every good thing which is related to essential elements or parts of human life on earth, comes unexpectedly. Material gain, education, degrees etc can be earned but sense or power to recognise or realization or real knowledge comes on its own.
Whenever unknown comes in life, we become suspicious. We fill with doubts. We welcome unknown with half heart only.
Perhaps attacks by many foreign powers over the centuries have wounded the general psyche of India and deep down people have started feeling fearful of unknown people. For centuries foreign powers have cheated India. In Past 500 years or so also Portuguese, Dutch, English and French people came here in the disguise of merchants but stabbed in the back. No wonder Indian psyche got wounded in general.
But before that, it was a pity when at some time in history of India, those who were powerful or had influence over masses imposed restrictions on travelling outside the boundaries of Indian subcontinent. To cross the salt water of sea became a sin. That restriction affected India a lot and people lost desire to travel far and wide elsewhere in world. And once habit of “no travel” was developed then it affected travelling within the boundaries of India also and people started living within their confined boundaries only.
* * * *
Scientific advancement in last 3-4 centuries has given a kind of arrogance to human being and he has started seeing everything from scientific eyes only. Even those who have no connection or proper scientific education ask about technological basis of a thing. Can science define everything? Is science able to solve all the mysterious things nature puts before us?
Is science able to compete with birds, animals etc which still follow natural ways of living? Most advanced equipments are unable to indicate with 100% efficiency about a natural calamity in advance but birds and animals and few human tribes living deep in forest get to know them well in advance and they migrate to safer place.
Birds don’t follow scientific developments but who and what tells them every year so that they leave extremely cold places and fly to India and who controls their calender? If weather change takes place late then they start flying late. Their schedule of leaving the extremely cold places is completely in synchronisation with the change in weather conditions. They have not lost touch with nature. Modern knowledge has become a tool to develop disbelief on everything around us. We have become creatures who don’t believe on anything. We have become complex in nature. We have reduced to a word “Incredulous” in our day to day lives.
Simple things don’t affect us any more, they don’t attract our attention and all that’s simple in life is useless, unimpressive for us. Hence from real life to reel life we are searching things which can shake us so that we can see something with widened eyes. Food should be spicy, Men should be winner and always successful and topper than others, women should be ultra glamorous and sexy, children should be extra active and highly vocal, TV programmes should be as loud as they can be else they are boring for us. Hardly a man will be found on the surface of earth, who can enjoy natural beauty with all its personal touches without comparing it with other things seen before. Comparison, comparison and comparison, this word is epitomising and defining the lives of us human being.
We cant enjoy two different things in their different aspects and individual beauties. One has to be small and one has to be bigger than other so that our comparative mind can understand those two things.
We are sitting in the era of information and every second thousands and millions of information are passing through us and yet our minds are getting timid. With more information our minds have become junkyard and our definitions are becoming narrow.
We know what? We cant simply throw any light on paper or at cyber space about films like Agantuk made by Satyajit Ray. To know about such films is to see them first hand, as second hand depiction about such films or any good art forms simply defile their beauty. Such pieces of arts are statements of artist like Satyajit Ray which they wish to give about status of humanity prevailing in their times.
Such efforts cant be understood on the basis of speed of the film or box office records of the films. Box office never can judge such efforts. People gathered below the Clock towers or in town halls or in a busy market in any city can never understand these arts. They are not made for a chaotic mind. They are not made for a vacillating mind who understands only deviation and heavy traffic of swiftly passing thoughts. Anyway such minds are not going to make any difference to humanity in a positive direction so great artists don’t bother about such minds. They search minds which have learnt either through their ways of performing their professional duties or by nature they are having tendency to be still whenever they want and can enjoy art with a paradigm of mind which is required to witness such art. That’s why a so called blockbuster may not find 10 admirers after 10 years of its first release but deep films like Agantuk may find admirers even after 50 years of their first release and every new watcher who has liked the film may feel astonished on the fact that such a film was made in early 90s when all kind of nonsense films were made all around to fill the pocket of producers, distributors and actors had to do even more nonsense things on the name of acting and actresses had to shed more clothes and gyrate different parts of their bodies to play attractive item heroines so that lust of men could be fuelled to fetch them to cinema halls to part some money from their pockets.
To watch different and variety of things is perfectly fine but to ridicule valuable and precious while you have capability only to watch something superficial is absolutely wrong and people do it all the time. Different people than us are always existing in the world and this is not necessary that if we are mean, bad inside then whole world will be like that only. Its not necessary that if we cant understand good things and are happy with superficial forms of arts then there are no people who really can understand and praise such good pieces of art.
* * * *
Agantuk attacks on this narrow understanding only.
When a family of three, husband (Depankar De), wife (Mamta Shankar) and a small boy gets a telegram indicating that a long lost uncle of the lady of the house is going to visit them in coming days then Depankar is filled with all kind of suspicion towards the so called lost uncle of the lady. How can a man visit her after 35-40 years? Even she was not born when he had left the home. Though she has heard about this uncle through her mother and grand parents but she is also doubtful.
Both husband and wife are filled with lot of questions. Why he is coming? What motive he has behind this visit?
Sender of telegram has clearly mentioned that they should reply him if couple is not in a position to accept him as a guest.
Depankar tries to convince his wife that they should reply her uncle that they are going outside of Culcutta for few days. Wife does not like such lie and they don’t send any reply and day comes when a guest arrives at their home while husband is out for his job.
Mamta welcomes the visitor but not in traditional and open ways. Visitor- the old man, can speak fine Bengali and he chews no words and asks clearly if his visit has created a problem for her but as they had not replied to his telegram so he took the risk of reaching here but he is ready to go out of the home if there is any problem.
Old man (Utpal Dutt) makes friends rather fast with the boy and start telling him stories of different countries he has visited in last many decades.
Mamta asks him why he had left the home and he tells that he had a desire to see the world on his own and he was not satisfied with the descriptions given in the books and hence when he got opportunity he left the home to become a world traveller. He gives reasoning why he did not marry in the logic that when he left home then he left all traditional ways also. He wanted to explore world and life. He visited many tribes first in India and then in other part of the world wherever he visited.
When Mamta asks what kind of food he would like to eat, he says,” I am all hungry and I can eat anything as I have eaten almost everything existing in the world”.
Utpal Dutt rests after the food and in the evening Depankar comes back from work and he is highly curious about the visitor and he asks Mamta if she recognised him correctly or if she saw his passport? He goes to guest’s room and Utpal Dutt welcomes him and asks him also if his visit has produced any kind of problem for them? He says further that he is ready to go out of the house any moment and he has not opened his suitcase yet.
Depankar says that his wife is already liking him and she has no doubt about her connection with the guest.
Utpal Dutt says that your wife is a simple woman and she is performing simply duties of a good host but he being modern man should not believe everything without any proof. Utpal Dutt takes out his passport and gives it to the Depankar who takes it and sees it and reads his name and sees the old photo.
He says that there is no doubt that his guest is actually the lost uncle of his wife. He returns the passport to old man. Utpal Dutt takes it and says,” But passport proves nothing about a man. It proves that this is the man but what kind of nature that man has, passport says nothing about that.”
In the evening, an actor friend (Robi Ghose) of the Depankar calls them and says that he and his wife want to visit the house to reveal the real identity of the guest. Actor thinks he is quite smart and he can compel guest to say truth about himself.
Actor and his wife come and meet the old man. Inspite of all the smartness of the actor, old man is proved too much smarter than him and actor feels embarrassed when old man asks him in the end,” So what do you feel about me?”.
Another friend of the Depankar, who is a judge, also comes to meet old man. Judge (Dhritman Chaterjee) has over confidence on his knowledge and mind power. He thinks guest is a cheater and wants to play thug to the family of his friend.
Dhritman Chaterjee is indulged in discussion with the Utpal Dutt about many things including science and technology, morality etc. He challenges old man about his views about tribals, civilization, science and technology and life as such.
Utpal Dutt stumps him with his vivid range of knowledge and Judge under the frustration of not being capable to match with the knowledge of old man simply attacks him directly. Under fit of anger he shouts,” Do you know your visit has produced a lot of problems before owners of this house. They are simple people and cant say anything but your arrival has given them a great degree of tension”. He says so many other insulting things and old man is visibly disturbed by this sudden change of the events.
Depankar tries to stop Judge and he tries to clarify to Guest but old man stops him by raising his hand. Judge leaves the house and host comes out to see him off and says that there was no need to say all those things. Judge says that he knows quite well and such people are like parasites and he will eat on his expense and will leave once he has fulfilled his motives.
In the night Mamta suddenly recalls that father of her mother had left a portion of his property on the name of his son who had left the home. She recalls that his uncle, this old man, has never come back again in Culcutta in all those years and he still should have that property on his name. Perhaps he has come to show ownership on that property.
Next morning when lady goes to Utpal Dutt’s room she finds that he has left the house. She asks the servant who tells that old man had left very early in the morning. Now husband and wife are disturbed.
They certainly did not want events to take this angle.
Depankar asks his wife to call the old solicitor of family of her father who had arranged property distribution among children of her grand parents. Lawyer is an old man and husband and wife visit him and get to know that old man was here in the morning. Couple asks about the property and lawyer says that old man has asked him to give him his property and now he has gone to a near by tribal area and he would like to go back next day.
Couple along with their son go to the tribal area and they find there old man lying and resting. Utpal Dutt welcomes them and asks them to stay to enjoy dance and music of tribal people.
What a naturally played music can do, can be seen in this scene where tribals are playing the music, singing and dancing and lady (Mamta) cant resist herself and joins them in dancing. A fantastic scene where nothing is imposed and its so natural that audience may feel inside desire of the lady when she joins the dance of tribal women.
Old man is returned to Culcutta along with the family and he is leaving the India to go to Australia. He gives an envelope to his niece and says that open it when he is gone. He renders parting knowledge to the boy that never become like a frog residing in a well. World is open to you and you should see it with open mind and eyes.
This time Mamta touches the feet of the old man and genuinely cries out of affection because she is departing from a dear one. Her Husband tries to touch feet of old man and now this is natural as he has developed a belief on old man and hence a relationship has been developed with him. Utpal Dutt stops him in between and embraces him. He says good bye to all and goes away.
Depankar opens the envelope and takes out a paper from envelop and reads it and he has no words to say anything. He simply gives it to his wife.
Old man has gifted all his property to his only living relative that is his niece.
She reads the letter which says that he knows he brought difficult situations before the couple. He always knew that his father had left a property on his name but he never took it because he always thought that he had left his home, parents and never did any service to his old parents when they needed him so he had no right to take any portion of that property. But now as he was in his last years and was going to Australia from where he would perhaps never come back alive to India he felt that his father had given his property to him out of his love and he should not disrespect that love and when he came back to India then he got to know that his only relative lives in Culcutta and hence he came here to take that property and to give her.
Couple thought that this unknown person had come to take away something from them but he came and gave them not only materialistic property but gave them precious knowledge about humanity.
That is Satyajit Ray and his cinema to people of world. He always gives something precious through his films. His cinema is invaluable and immensely helpful to human being.
Every actor simply lives the character on screen in their full bloomed beauty. Audience of hindi cinema normally sees Utpal Dutt in the roles where he plays them in somewhat loud manner where theatrical touch is always there but here in Agantuk he gives subtle and sensitive performance which very few actors in the country and even in the world can touch.
Mamta Shankar, who is daughter of great Udai Shankar astonishes with her acting skills. Depankar De is equally impressive. Robi Ghose who has been an essential part of almost all of Ray’s films justifies his association with Ray. Dhritman Chaterjee in a small role leaves long lasting impact.
Amir Khan is stressing upon the issue of handeling children now but when he had not even made his debut in cinema, long before that Satyajit Ray was showing through his characters in his films how adults can interact with kids and how they can treat them with respect.
Hardly any filmmaker can match Ray’s extraordinary skill of character development and the knowledge of which scene in what way should be used to bring emphasised impact and where camera should be placed and whether camera should move or actors should move or how light should be used to bring required impact. To praise his technical skills is like to show candle light to sun and only we people can point out when moon of his skill changes its phases as per requirement.
* * * *
If mind has become too tired by seeing violent films full of blood shed, or to see events happening in real life also where students of 8th standard are killing their fellow student or people are attacking women coming out of hotel and news of violence are spread all over through international channels and to see how political parties don’t trust any other party at all and game of cheating each other is at full bloom and we ourselves don’t trust anyone in our vicinity then take out time to see this film having simple tale but which sheds light on valuable elements of human life and which are essential for the survival of humanity on earth.
See the anthropologist Ray through this film and if one has not seen any of his film then his last film may force one to go back to his cinematic creations and by the time one will finish Pather Panchali he will be enriched not only in cinematic knowledge but he will feel he has been awarded with so many other things existing in the life.
60 Responses to “Agantuk : Director of Directors “Satyajit Ray” says Adieu to the audience !”
Leave a Reply
Our Comments Policy : The following kinds of comments are troll capped, blocked and/or commenter's identity reported publicly: Verbal abuse, personal attacks, hate statements, spam, trolls, advertising. Please assist us in keeping the comments clean. Use the contact form to let us know if you find unwarranted comments on PFC. Thank you.
- Neeraj Pandey Wanted : Dead or Alive!!!
- A Week With Anjum Rajabali, Sriram Raghavan and Anurag Kashyap
- Wednesday - and why I don’t read reviews !!!
- Two Dollops of Hope, Too Many Sprinklings of the Unreal
- When Naseeruddin Shah and Anupam Kher met on A WEDNESDAY
- Wednesday - and why I don’t read review
- Review of A Wedn
- A Wednesday R
- A Week With Anjum Rajabali, Sriram Raghavan and Anurag Ka
- Two Dollops of Hope, Too Many Sprinklings of the U
Recent Posts:
Hottest Today:

Sponsor PFCOne













a very good read about one of the most underrated movies of my favourite diretor… i particularly like the magic scene where Utpal dutt explains the solar eclipse…
@Papai,
Thanks for comment. Thats a remarkable scene which you have mentioned where a man, who has seen many countries, have seen so called developed life of so called developed nations and have interacted with most natural human species the tribals, is teaching kids the mystery behind solar and moon eclipses. Ray shows through Utpal Dutt’s character how a man who knows interact with kids. He does not impose him on them, being a matured knowledgeable adult on kids rather he treats them with respect and invites them to interact on equality basis in that game.
A wonderful film.
Briiliant dissection RK.
Ray was 10 creative persons mixed in 1. Writer, director, cinematographer, music director, editor, advertising genius, illustrator, calligrapher, short story writer, the list is endless…
An absolute inspiration to all of us Indians and all cinephiles the world over.
Have seen Agantuk. Now after this, I want to see it all over again.
On a more personal level, my favourite Ray film is Goopy Gyne Bagha Byne - what mastery, what satire, what fun :d
@G Gopal,
Re: multifacted personality of Ray - Absolutely true.
He touched subjects deeply whatever subject he selected for a film and he touched many many subjects during his active filmmaking years.
A man of micro and even Nano details.
as translation of a hindi poem says:
—
[ Which trait of his
should we praise
here even soil
shines like gold ]:)
Thanks for your comment –
Inspiring article!
Lovely article. Agantuk is one of my favourite movies, if not my absolute favourite. My favourite scene is the debate which Utpal Dutt and Dhritiman Chatterjee have.
Its amazing how Ray blends in so many tracks, so many issues and so many thoughts in such a seamless manner!
An interesting snippet of information — Agantuk was one of the highest grossing films of France in the year of its release there. You will also find it mentioned in Cahiers du Cinema as one of the best films of that year.
@ G Gopal,…Did you know “Goopy Gayne Bagha Bayne” is the only film which ties 3 generations of the Rays ? Upendra Kishore Ray Choudhury ( his grandfather who wrote the story ), Shukumar Ray Choudhury ( his father who did the first illustrations for the same ) and finally Satyajit Ray Choudhury ( yeah ! thats his full name ) who made it into a film ! :)
The story in the movie actually differs a lot from the book though…. it was a masterpiece…. the ghosts dancing scene is still unmatched
@ …Yes Papai,…:) Though I enjoyed the story a lot as a kid. And the voice of the ghost in the film was Ray himself ! :)
To be frank , it was too lengthy !!
in fact “agantuk” is based on a ray short story — “atithi” — however, the film has far surpassed the short story in interpretation and narration….
yes…also the short story was a lot simpler in the narration… more black and white i suppose
@J (5), Thanks for your comment
@Debashri, Thanks for your comment.
Thats indeed a very powerful scene where vocal Utpal Dutt and Dhritman Chaterjee gave their active input and Depankar De and Mamta Shankar contributed through passive way. The rage on the face of Utpal Dutt when Dhritman Chaterjee tries to insult him over the question of man eating tendency in some tribes and Utpal Dutt says Barbaric, absolutely barbaric and when he brings example of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and Dhritman sees his defeat clearly and frustration overpowers him. So impressive, breath taking scene. Tension is so obvious in the scene that its difficult to pay attention to rest of the world, whats happening there.
Gazab ka scene!
@Arijit (7),
Thanks for sharing info. about business side of Agantuk. Its often true with Ray’s films that they earned more money abroad than in India where they were not even released in varoious parts of the country.
@Playback,
Did not know Rays father made illustrations for the story. we should search if Sandeep Ray was also associated with the film or not in any way?
Then it will be association of four generations:)
@Ajay K Saxena (11),
Film or article?
Former is not and later surely is quite lengthy.
sorry for that:(
have print out and whenever in your life you travel then read it.:)
Thanks for taking out time to comment.
@Arijit (12), Papai (13),
Thats so true, film is quite an extended version of the story and far more effective. Thats the beauty of genius creators, when they follow up their past work then they enhance its impact multi fold.
Sandeep Ray is associated to Goopy-Bagha series thru Goopy Bagha Fire Elo, for which he turned director…. Although he used material created by his father, the film lacks the Midas touch of the master that marks all of Rays films with a natural spontaneity and life…
@Papai (19),
Thats true.
goopy bagha firey elo is quite flat…doesn’t have the dramatic element of earlier goopy bagha ventures….also the dialogue which reaches a high point in hirak rajar deshe is missing in sandip ray’s attempt….
In a way, the film was also reflective of the attitude of knowledge worship among Bengali middle class of his era. On one hand, there are people who use knowledge as a utility, a tool, and a social propellant; and on the other hand, we have the fascinating character played brilliantly by Uttpal Dutt who knows it all but is he is after the family Money, is what people around him wonder, but it seem so strange. What does he really want? Thoughts of the family member and by now the viewer: He truly is a stranger
Satyajit Ray managed to weave an eclectic web of philosophical meanderings, discourse on culture, society et al into the story, stirs it up like steaming sweet tea and serves it in the environment of Bangla Adda. And he pulls it off. Fascinating!
Mamata Shankar was great. The scene towards the end of the movie, when she dances with people from local tribe, is brought alive by her dancing. Smart me at first thought that the scene could have been edited a bit but then slowly with the rising drumbeats, the screen comes alive.
Makes you wanna sit in front of the screen like a Kupa Mondok
For fans of Sukumar Ray, a
poem of Sukumar Ray translated by Satyajit Ray
Enjoy some Nonsense.
“eclectic web of philosophical meanderings”…I wonder how people who are grappling to construct sentences in english end up writing such stuff !!!
It is the eclectic grappling effect.
Ok ! :) My Apologies ! :)
Np:)
It is a word that I learnt about three months ago :)
hey RK - that was for article only .. movie is simply awesome…
btw .. i visited your blog and loved the poetry.. especially that tarkoal one…
wud love to know more about yor views and poetry , if you login to Gtalk ..please add me as ajaykumar.saxena [at] gmail.com
keep on writing…..
@RK
Sandip Ray’s name is mentioned in the opening credits of Goopy Gyne Bagha Byne under the special thanks to category
@Vinayak (22),
Good to see you active again in comment section after so many days.
Not only in “Agantuk” but in his several films S Ray has tried to reveal weaknesses of those days society, local, countrywide and global also. He has been making statements on these weaknesses through his films.
He tried to point out the prevalent conditions in WB in general and in Culcutta especially in his films like “Pratidwandi” “Seemabaddh” and “Jana Aranya”. In his subtle way he questioned ways of active political parties and their ideology in that time in that region.
Through “Agantuk” he strikes finally on human ego. he strikes on common beliefs which masses collects without giving any thinking. That “Adda” reference was fantastic to bring back pseudo intelligentia on earth.
There are various similarities in Gandhi, Tagore and Satyajit Rays ways of thinking. Its relevant to mention that Gandhi also in his somewhat autobiography “My experiemnts with truth” writes that Tongawala in UK does not waste time in useless gossiping but whenever he gets time he takes out newspaper or a book to read.
[ on a very light note, even Prakash Mehra was quite obvious in showing Vinod Khanna reading newspaper while standing in a cue at a bus stop while AB is passing , singing Jindagi to bewafa hai ek din thukrayegi,.... wo muqadar ka sikandar kehlayega"]:)
That music and dancing scene at Tribals place is just fantastic and may be one of the best scenes in all the Rays films. Others dont come even near this scene in terms of liveliness of a scene.
there is no connection but that was the scene which suggested that Pt Nehru or Indira Gandhi’s joining tribals or folk artists in their dancing might have been natural. [ this reference is not to make you angry@};-]
@Ajay (27),
Ya movie is simply awesome.
Thanks for your kind comment.
I am humbled to know that you liked something.
have noted your contact.
@Sulakshna (28),
Thanks for info. so that gathers four generations of a family in one film:)
RK….read a truly nice post after ages on PFC…Keep it up man…Agantuk is also one of my favourite Ray films..keeps you thinking long after veiwing
@aditi (32),
Thanks for kind words.
Hope you did not miss article on Khemchand Prakash. :)
Agantuk is very very articulate film and surely it fulfils its responsibility to send audience in deep thinking after its viewing is finished. If one can think then film does not leave him.
Its a live film which sheds light on human life. its an experience to watch it.
even if one does not understand camera angle, shots etc s/he will be able to notice various specific things used in certain scenes.
RK,
I do drop in to read stuff here. Infact, you are back after a long time.
Someone else( remember Charles Foster Kane…the guy you had a little run in with over Satyajit Ray) also asked me to watch
trivia on ray…
someone once told me that the Wills logo and cover design was by him…
RK - Welcome back and it’s been worth the wait.
DPac - Ray designing the Wills logo and cover is one of the stories which can’t be corroborated (atleast I haven’t seen any authentic source). Ray worked for D.J. Keymer (which later became O&M in India) and did soem great campaigns for ICI, Lever Bros and Lipton. The reason for this legend could be that Imperial Tobbacco was a D.J. Keymer account at the same time
Subrat…
i have tried the past few years to get some solid evidence to back it up. havent found anything except for what u wrote :-)
@Vinayak (34),
Ya I was not here for many days but I have been here for a week or so and did not find any of your comment.
Charles Foster Kane… name id is bit familiar. Cant recall the matter but if it was because of “His Satyajit Ray” and not “The Satyajit Ray” then any kind of clash is possible:).
Even if you dont get all 3 films, try to get Jan Aranya where Maestro touches a subject dealing with masses. Unemployment, family limitations, how marketing skill was becoming part of life, and values were going in back side- all transitions are shown so deeply.
When Prakash Mehra showed Vinod Khanna reading newspaper while waiting at a bus stop for a bus, then the people you mentioned were either at the end of finishing their education or were dreaming about becoming an actor like Vinod Khanna. Time was different and certainly these (then) young men were not living so much destructive life that they could be dangerous for others while on road. :-?
@Subrat (36), @DPac (35,37)
Thanks for your comment.
Bhai log, If I may interfere in your trivia play!
If Satyajit Ray made the logo then it should be a fortunate thing for Wills and its producer co ITC and Ray was a professional illustrator for years and its quite possible he did it. If he did not make it then its loss of ITC that they missed having a piece of creation created by the artist Satyajit Ray. No?
Rk saaaab
bas ek ‘legend’ ek legend ke baaare mein…
@DPac (40),
yes Sir,
A legend about Legend discussed by you two “would be legends” !
sahi hai :)
I liked Agantuk. I have seen only 3-4 films of RAY and liked them. I saw 2 of his short films, Sadgati and pikoo also. good films. have you seen Shatranj ke khiladi? please write about that film.
I want to know how you found that film.
Now I observed the fourth picture where Utpal Dutt’s face is in close up and rest 3 characters are also cleraly visible, standing at a distance. How this shot was taken? amazing camera work here.
@Krishna (42),
Thanks for your comment. Sadgati was a good short film and Pikoo is a very good short film about the kid.
It will be a pleasure to write about “Shatranj ke Khiladi”.
Ray came in Hindi cinema and registered his mastery by this single film and hence proved that language is no bar when passion, sincerity and confidence are intact.:)
@Krishna (43),
The scene (poster 4) itself is very interesting scene in the film and camera has served a better purpose by covering all the characters in single frame though a distance is there between them.
Utpal Dutt hears the sound of car, while he is lying there on ground and he asks a tribal woman to bring a cot there and perhaps this is a tough situation for him also to face the family as he does not know with which mentality they have reached there. Child searches him first and shouts for him.
Face expressions of Utapal Dutt and three different body languages of three other characters- thats how a maestro can take a single shot- all characters expressing their inner thoughts through their outer expressions and camera is catching them alive as per instructions of director.
Diffrent elements are creating harmony in a scene.
simply wonderful
hi everybody
this movie has multiple layers.each time u watch it and u come just keep re-discovering it.last time when i watched the move this scene where utpal dutt tells dhritiman “iam not a tribal.right from my childhood i have Tagore,Marx,Freud…in my blood.that’s the reason i need field notes”..this is an outstanding scene.here ray questions the so called intellectuals of the civilized worlds.
@Sandeep,
Very true about Agantuk.
contrast or counter points than the prevailing conditions in the society, was there in many of the Ray’s films.
In Agantuk he covers biggest canvas ever and addressed whole of the humanity, often directly by hard hitting dialogues and by creating situations. Though again a characters based film but concerns are very big.
Thanks for sharing a nice and wise comment. :)
Hollywood in rays heart
One of his oft-repeated sayings was,
Says Martin Scorsese,
Elia Kazan said,
Ray came across Gregory Peck in Europe. Peck, like Marlon Brando, had showed keen interest in working with Ray. He had told the maestro,
Ray met David Lean at an Agra Hotel in the early 1960s. He walked up to Lean and, after the introduction, spent hours discussing international cinema. Ray marveled at Lean
In 1977, Richard Attenborough acted as the ruthless, scheming General Outram in Shatranj ke Khiladi at a pay much lesser than what he received for, say, The Great Escape (1963). Says Attenborough,
Francis Ford Coppola admitted in an interview:
Ray was close to making an English film for Twentieth Century Fox with Marlon Brando, Shashi Kapoor and Audrey Hepburn; to the stars
Ray pointed out to author Hirak Sengupta that Steven Spielberg
Presenting the Lifetime Achievement Oscar in 1991, a cheerful Audrey Hepburn said,
@krishn,
friend, we do have an iView section in case you havent noticed :-)
dont get me wrong, your info would get the deserving audience if you send in stuff through the iView section.
it will be more fruitful than repeatedly commenting 10-15 times…
thats is if you feel like it…
=58..
getting u absolutely wrong…ooooppppsss right;)
mate..didnt know b4 that
a single house in 600sq. m nd 4 flats in 600 sq. m
cover different ground area…;)
sorry i cant write for iview or youview..
im not writer..im reader…ican coment..
ican search copy paste…
if u find my cmnts violating pfcs rules…pls feel free 2 delete them:)
if u like writing..pls continue story on experiments in screenwriting post…:)>-
if u wanna show power.. u missed ipl post..
pls read cmnt 2..rexteme attacks pfc authors there..issue him warning:-?
u r hunting veg.dinocyrous here:o
didnt know highlighting gud points abt ray ll b seen as crime by u…[-x