Brian De Palma- No winners in a war

Ratna
Ratnakar Sadasyula   | Talking-Points | September 17, 2009 at 3:09 am       Print this article!  Print


/**  Spoilers in post

Casualties-of-War-794914Quite often  when  i  go  through   some  of   the  best  anti  war  movies  that  have been  made,  i can’t  help  noticing  one thing, in a vast  majority  of   the  cases,  the  anti  war  movies  come  out  after  the  actual  war  is  over. I  take  a look  at  some  of  the  more  well known  anti  Vietnam  war flicks,  Apocalypse Now,  Platoon,  Full  Metal  Jacket, and  then  i  see  that all  these  movies  have  been  released  after  the  end  of  the  war,  post  1975.   Even  when  anti  Vietnam war  protests  were  raging  across  the  US,  and  many  Hollywood  stars   voiced  their  opposition to  the  war,  there were  actually  no  significant  anti  Vietnam war  dramas  comming  out  from  Hollywood.  The  only  Vietnam  war  drama  released  around  the  time  was  John  Wayne’s   propagandist  The Green Berets,  which  tried  to  drum  up  public  support  in favor of  the  war.  Is it due  to  the  fact  that  Hollywood  was  afraid  of  adverse audience reactions,  some  kinda  backlash?   Then  again  i  see  the  slew  of   movies  about  Iraq  in  recent  times, In the Valley of  Elah,  Lions for Lambs,  Jarhead, Redacted this  while  the  war  in  Iraq  still  shows  no  signs  of  an  end.   Was it  that Hollywood  finally  took  up  the  courage  to  take  a stand?   Were  the  stridently   anti  war  postures  of Sean  Penn, George  Clooney,  Jane Fonda, Nick Nolte having  an  effect? Would  want  to  think  so,  but  a catch  here,  most  of  these  movies  started  to  come,  only  in  the  later  half  when  the  war  went  horribly  wrong, the  American  public’s  mood  turned  against  it,  more  against  the  Bush  Govt’s  mishandling of  the  situation.  One  more  interesting  thing  i  notice  is  that  most  of  Hollywood’s   anti  war  dramas  center around  Vietnam  and  now  Iraq,  rather  than  WW2, barring  some  like  Catch 22.   Again  i  feel  its  cause  Vietnam  and  Iraq,  make it  easier, both  of  them  wars  in  which  the  US  has  lost  badly,  not  too  popular  with  the  public,  so  easier  to  weave  an  anti  war  message  around   them.   Just  some  thoughts  in  the  head,  as  i  started  to  draft  out  my  take  on  Brian  De  Palma’s   Casualties  of  War.

The   movie   starts  off   with  the opening  credits  proclaiming it  to be  a true  story  based  on  an  account by   reporter  Daniel  Lang for the  New  Yorker  in  1969,  incidentally  the  period  when the  Vietnam  war  was  it’s  peak.   The  factual  story  was  about  a  group of  American  soldiers  taking a  teen  Vietnamese girl  as  captive  and  then  subjecting  her to  gang rape  and  murder.   Now  even  considering   that  what  we will  be  watching  would  be  based  on  real  events,  and  the  ending  would  be  tragic,   and  even as we prepare  ourselves  mentally  to  handle  it,  what  follows  on  the  screen,  for  the  next  couple  of  hours, is  shattering  and  shocking.  De  Palma’s   movie  is  not  just   about  the  war,  soldiers  breaking  down,  but  also  raises  uncomfortable  questions  on  masculinity, helplessness  and  cowardice.   It  is  very  rarely  that  you  see  strong  male  characters  in  Brian  De  Palma  movies,   most  of  them time  they  are  either  conflicted  internally( Raising  Cain,  Dressed  to  Kill)  or  wimpish( Body  Double)  or  just  helpless  to prevent  tragedy.  It   was  there  in  Blow  Out,  where  John  Travolta  is  not  able  to save  the  woman  he  loves,  and  its   here  in  Casualties  of  War  too,  where  the  newbie  private PFC  Erikkson( Michael  J Fox) finds  himself  a  helpless  witness  to  the  horrifying tragedy  unfolding  before  his  eyes.  A  tragedy  that  comes  to him  in a  flashback  when  he  chances  on  a young  Vietnamese woman in  the  subway,  who  reminds  him  of  the  central  figure  in  the  tragedy.

That  is  where   we  get  to  the villian  of  the  piece,  Sgt. Tony  Meserve( Sean  Penn), whose  character  in  fact  actually starts out on a heroic  note.  In a  highly  charged up  combat  scene,  that  is  somewhat  typically  De  Palma,  with  explosions,  graphic violence,  tracking  shots,  Meserve  comes  back  and  saves   Erikkson  who  falls  halfway  into  an  underground tunnel.  Actually this is  where  the  ambiguity  starts,  Meserve  seems  the  typical  war  hero,  the  kind  who  would  put  his  life on the line to save his  fellow  soldiers, and  Erikkson  is  actually grateful to him.   When  one  of   Meserve’s   squad  members  ”Brownie”  is  shot dead  in a  Viet  Cong  attack , Private  Antonio Diaz( John Leguizamo) comes  in as  the  replacement. The  difference  in the  characters  is   established,  with  Erikkson  trying  to  win  over  the  natives,  while  his  colleagues   consider  them  as  ”sub human”  pests  to be  exterminated.  So  far  the  movie   moves  in  a  standard  war  movie  pattern,  enemy  attacks, lots of  yelling  around,  bombs falling,  soldiers  getting  hit,  and  De  Palma  upping  the  ante  with  his  camera  tracking,  and  some  stunning  photography of  the  Vietnam  jungles.

The   turn around  comes   when  the  squad  learns  that  their  leave  has  been  cut  short,  and  they  have  been  asked  to  look at  a village  that  harbors  suspected   Viet  Cong soldiers.   And   this  is  where  the  so  far “heroic”  Meserve  actually breaks  down.  In  recent  times  there have  been  news  reports  about  how  soldiers  in  the  Indian army  quite  often  frustrated  with  the  hard working  conditions,  and  denial  of  leave,  were  either  committing  suicide  or  taking  it  out  on  their  superior  officers.   The  fact  is  that  war even  at  the  best  of  times  is   hardly  pretty,  i  mean  living  with  bombs falling  all  around  you,  seeing  your  best  friend or  mate  blown  to pieces,  finding  yourself  cut  off    from  family  for  months  on  is  frustrating.  While  De  Palma’s  intention is  not  to  justify  what  happens  from  here on,  the  fact  that  some one like  Meserve,  could  break  down  in  a manner, that  is  horrific, is  frightening,  something  about  how  the  beast  comes out  of  a human being.

06817

The  victims  in  a war  are  more  often  than  not  the  most  vulnerable-  the elderly,  the  women, the  children, people  who basically can’t  fend  for  themselves.   Meserve  takes  his  frustration  out  here,  by  kidnapping  a young, teenage  Vietnamese girl  Than Thi Oanh(  Thuy Thuy Lee),   and  wants  to  use  her  as  their  sex  slave,  another  practice during  wars,  when  local  girls  were  often picked up  by  soldiers  for  their  own  pleasure.   What  is  horrifying  though is  how   Meserve  just  treats  this  as  fun,  some  kind  of  recreation.  In  reality the    hapless  girl  had  nothing to  do  with  the VC,   she  was  unfortunate  in  becomming the  target  of  Meserve’s  deranged  thinking.  Erikkson  protests   but  is  helpless.

Eriksson: Give me a minute on this thing we’re doing. I mean, what we’re doing. What are we doing, sarge?

Meserve: We have a VC suspect. Is that what you mean? She’s a VC whore and we’re gonna have fun with her.

Eriksson: She’s just a farm girl.

Meserve: You’re the cherry here, right? So lighten up.

Clark: -Let me carry the weight. -What’s the problem, sarge?

Meserve: He don’t think our VC whore is a VC whore.

Again  one  moment  during  the  girl’s  abduction  stands  out,  her  mother  running  after  her  and  giving  her  a scarf, so that  she could  stuff  it in her  mouth  and  not  scream.  And  then  one  of  the  soldiers  casually telling  the  girl’s  mother  to  get  some rest.  The  men  out  there,  have become beasts,  they  don’t  really  care  about  what  they  are  doing,  and  what  is  worse  they  take it as fun.   In  fact  they  are  thankful  to  Meserve  for  arranging  this  ”fun”  of  having  their  turns  with  a  young  nubile  female,  Erikkson  finding  himself  the  odd  man  out,  his  bravery  and  even  his  masculinity  comming into  question.   Again  the tendency to show  off  one’s  sexual  prowess  as  signs of  manhood,  to  the  group  Erikkson’s  objections  make  him look like a  wet  blanket,  what is  more  worse,  they  begin  to  doubt  his  sexuality  itself.   The  only  person  who  supports  Erikksson  is  Diaz,  who  whoever  gives  into  his  own  weak  moments.

Well maybe when I’m through with her, I’m gonna come after you. Maybe when I’m done humping her, I’m gonna come hump you!

11.28-film-lead.casualties-

Meserve  feels  Erikkson’s   objections  is  maybe  because  he is  gay.  It  never  occurs  to  him  that  Erikkson  was  objecting  on ethical grounds.   Also  the  prevalent  feeling  during  the  time of   equating  homosexuality  with  a loss of  manhood,  sign of  weakness.   And  this  is  where  De  Palma  excels,  holding  back  his  tendency  to   go  over top,  he  treats  these  scenes  with  restraint,  not  being too much  in  the  face.  In  fact   for  me  after   Carlito’s  Way,  i  would  say  this  was one of  De  Palma’s   more  restrained  movies,  going  ballistic  in  the  action  scenes, but  at  the  same  time  operating  with  a sense  of  dignity  and  restraint  in  the  more dramatic  scenes.    The  actual  rape  scene  is  harrowing,  not  very  graphic,  but  we  feel  the  horror  of  it,  as  the  men  take turns  raping her. One  of  the  more  horrifying  moments   is  when  a  particuarly  sadistic  member  of  the  group, Clark( Don Harvey),  threatens the  girl  with a  knife  just  to  get an  erection.    Actually  barring  Erikkson, none of  the  other  group members  even  treat  her like  a  human  being,   she  is  just  a plaything  for  them,   some  one  to be  abused  at  will,  a human  punching bag  for  their  frustrations.  Or  as   Meserve   puts  it  in  an  earlier  scene

What  we  are  gonna  do  is  requisition  ourselves  a girl,  a little  portable  R & R,  It’ll break up  the boredom, keep up the morale.

Its  however  the  members  behavior  during  the  rape  that  is  really  unsettling.  They  take  its  as  some  kind  of  fun, laughing, joking,   wishing  for  ”beers”,    as Erikkson  becomes   a helpless  bystander  to  the  entire  tragedy,  unable  to prevent it.   By now  Meserve   has  become  a raging  maniac,   caring  nothing  about   ethics  or  conscience,  the  beast  has  been  fully  unleashed,  as  he keeps  taunting   Erikkson  for  his  ”cowardice”  and  ”lack  of  manliness”.

Yea, I  walk  through  the  Valley  of  Evil,   …..  I  shall  fear no  death,  cause  I’m  the  meanest  motherfucker  in the entire  valley.

After  Oanh  is  gang  raped, left  bloodied,  battered   mentally  and physically,  Erikkson  tries  to  comfort  her,  trying  to help  her out  of  the  mess.   He  is  found  out  trying  to help  her  escape,  and  a  scuffle  between  Erikkson  and  his  team members,  after  his  refusal  to kill  her,  leads  to  him giving  away  their  location.    Again  Oanh’s  death  scene  on  the  bridge  is  harrowing,  bloodied,  stabbed,  as  she  struggles  to escape,  it  hits  you  hard.    For  me  however   what   really  prevented  this  movie  from  becomming  a true  classic,  is  in  the  post  Vietnam  scenes.  Erikkson’s  attempts  to   convict  Meserve  and co,  the  resistance  he faces  from  the  system,  all  of  it  is  like  ”seen  it before”,  and even  the  final  court  scenes.    Most  of  it  goes  down to  heavy  handed  moralizing, preaching,  and  a Hollywood  style  court  room  drama.  Good  in  itself,  but  then  you  consider  what  you  have  seen  before  that,  and  it   some  what  appears   contrived.  For  me  Casualties  of  War   was  like  a movie  in  2  parts,  for a  major  part,  realistic, gritty,  not   pulling  back,  at  the  same  time  treating  the  subject  with  respect,  and  then  in  the  post  Vietnam  scenes,  becomming  heavy  handed  and  melodramatic.

casualties.preview

Still   i  would  recommend   this  movie,  for   the  issues  it  brings  up,  the  way war  turns  seemingly  normal  human beings  into beasts,  of  how  nice  guys   like  Erikkson  find  themselves  helpless  to  prevent  tragedies  around  them,  the  rather  twisted  definitions  of  ”manhood”  and  finally  how  in  a  war,  the  real  ”Casualties of  War”   are  the  innocent  people  who  are  actually  caught up  in  the  conflict,  people  like Oanh,  who are  not  really  connected  with  any  ideology, but  have  to  bear  the  brunt of  some  one’s   frustration  or  ”twisted”  definition of  R&R.   It  is  this  feeling  of   helplessness  that   you  carry  long after  the movie is over.

And  then  some  exceptional  performances,   notably  from  Sean  Penn,  as  the  pyschotic  Meserve.   Penn  does  seem to excel in these  kind  of  roles,  and  though  he  does  have  a  De Niro  hangover in  his  performance,    his  transition  from  a seemingly  heroic   soldier  to  a pyschotic, bullying  maniac  is  excellent.  This  was one of  the  rare  serious, dramatic  kind of  roles  which Michael.J.Fox had  done  in  his  career,   unfortunately  the  movie’s  failure  meant  that  Fox  could  not  break  out  of  his “Teen Idol”  image.  I  say  it  as  unfortunate,  coz  Fox’s  performance  as  the  conscientious  objector  Erikkson, is  effective, low key, without  ending  up as a caricature,  showing  there  is  much  more  to him  than  just  rom coms or  light  comedies.  Somehow  unlike Johnny Depp  or  Leo,   Fox could  never  make  that  transition  from  a “Teen Idol”  to  an  adult, matured  actor.   Thuy Thuy Lee who  plays Oanh is  first  rate,  as  she  wonderfully  captures  the  agony  and  helplessness  of a  young  girl,  subjected  to  abuse,  rape   for  no  fault of  hers, i  believe this  was  her  only  screen role.

Tags: Anti War movies, brian de palma, Michael J Fox, Sean Penn, Vietnam War, War Dramas.
GD Star Rating
loading...

 

2 Comments

  1. Abhra Mukherjee Abhra Mukherjee says:

    Definitely one of sean penn’s best. Thanks for posting garu.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  2. tejas tejas says:

    Your analysis of background of a movie or movies is often more interesting than the actual write-up. And I mean this as a sincere compliment.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...

Leave a Reply

:) :lol: :rofl: :banginghead: :witsend: :yahoo: :wacko: :bow: :glasses: :notsure: :roll: 8-O :twisted: :cry: :cool: more »