David Fincher -The Game

Ratna
Ratnakar Sadasyula   | Movies, Review | December 29, 2008 at 10:17 am


**/ Spoiler Alerts**/

In  my  second on  the    David  Fincher  series  i  would  be taking a look  at  one  of  Fincher’s   more underrated movie  The Game, a kind of  abstract  thriller.

The  Game  is the story  of   Nicholas Van Orton(Michael Douglas),  a multi  millionaire in  San Francisco,  but  leading a lonely life,  divorced  from his wife.  On  his  40th  birthday, his  more  bohemian,  free spirited  brother  Conrad( Sean Penn),  presents him with  an unusual  gift.    It  is a  game  offered  by a mysterious organization,  Consumer  Recreation Services,  of  which not much is known.  Not  much is really  known about The Game,  except  that it  seems to be  a  kind  of  live action role playing game,  where the person is a live participant.

Nicholas  is rejected by  CRS,  after  a lengthy  pyschological  test involving  filling up all kinds of  questionaries.  However  the real “Game”   begins  right  now  for Nicholas,  as he  begins to discover  that things are not  what as they seem.  His entire  orderly  world, goes  topsy  turvy,  as he  begins to experience things  he never had before.   He finds  assistance  in  Christine(Deborah Unger),  who  helps  him to escape  from CRS,  only  to find  out he has been victim  of  a double crossing.   Well  to see  what does happen  to Nicholas,  and  what the Game actually  is,  just watch the movie.

The   Game  is  David Fincher’s   most  abstract movie yet.  On  the surface  it  looks  like a thriller,  with the hero  caught  in extraordinary  circumstances,  but  a deeper  examination, reveals  multiple  layers.   It is not  just  Nicholas,   but  as an audience  you  find  yourself   examining and re examining  every  incident, and  even  by climax,  you  are still not sure,   what  has happened.  Even  after  multiple viewings,  The Game  still  continues to perplex me at times.

Though  the  movie is indeed  layered,   one  of  the basic  concepts  around  which  the movie is  built,  is  the “What If”  idea.  

What  if  you  suddenly  were in a situation,  where  you had to question your own  value systems,  your beliefs?

Nicholas   is put through  the  same grind.   Fincher  actually  sets it up,  in the first  couple  of reels,  where   we  get to see Nicholas  character.    He is  rich,  but a loner,  not  a man given to any personal  relationships.   He  is obsessed  with  precision,  punctuality,  and  professionalism.   He  is a total  careerist,  and  in  fact  he does not  really  think  much of  his birthday.  All  we see  are  flashes  of  his life as  a kid,  when  his father commited  suicide  on his  40th birthday.    He   is  totally  obsessed  with   correctness,  to the extent  that  when he  corrects   a word  for one of  the CRS  persons,  he remarks

 you’re a left-brain  word fetishist.

In   fact   Nicholas  seems  to have no other life,  other than his career and work.   So  when  the   Game  begins,  things  happen to him, which dont  happen often.    The  person  in the TV  begins to speak to him,  saying  he is been watched,   his  pen  begins to  leak,  his suitcase is jammed  shut.  In  one  instant,  his  entire carefully  organized  life is  totally  turned   upside down.  

In  fact  what exactly  is the  Game?  In  first  place  he is  rejected,   and  then  suddenly   the  Game begins  to play  out in his life.  Is it a kind  of  scam,   or  is his brother  playing tricks on him?   Not  exactly  sure.   But  what is  undeniable  is  that  this  Game or whatever it is ,  seems  some kind  of   weird  plan,  to make  you  do things  you never do.

Fincher  in  this  case,  is  making  a critique   of   the  “success at any cost”  attitude  of  the  American  businessman.  There is a memorable  scene,  where   Nicholas  goes  to fire  the  company’s   long  standing  partner,   as he  was not bringing  in enough revenues.   Though  that  person  happens  to be his  father’s   best friend,  it  is immaterial  to  Nicholas,   as  he  just  cares  only  for the bottomline.   But  precisely  at  that  moment,  his  briefcase  is stuck,  and does not open,  leaving him  totally  embarassed.  

Again  at  some  parts   The  Game  works  out  like a horror flick,  as in the scene  when Nicholas,  walks to his hotel room,  finds it totally  trashed,  and  as he cuts his finger,  and blood  flows all over.   Or  the scene  where  the lights in the  Den of his mansion,  start  glowing, and he sees  spray painted  images everywhere. 

The   fact  is  The  Game  seems  a never  ending mystery.  Just when you   think  you unravelled one layer, another  begins,  and another.   And the  worst  comes  when  he gives  a  complaint  against  CRS   only  to  find  that  when he raids  their  office, with the cops,  it is not  just there any more. The   Game  is not  a movie with a straightforward  narration,   in  fact  Fincher,  deliberately   leaves all the loose ends.   It  seems  he is a playing  a Game  on two levels,  one  in  the movie,  and one with the viewer.   What  Fincher  does here  is  put  out  the  twists and turns  to the audiences  and expects  them to  draw  their own conclusions.

You  do  know  that  Nicholas  is in  a What if  situation,  which  forces  him  to evaluate  his own basic  values.    But  why  have something like CRS,  a shady organization,  and a totally bizarre  Game?   And  why  in  fact  is Nicholas rejected and then  sucked into the Game?  Is it some kind  of pyschological  trick,  where  you  draw a person into a false  sense  of  complacency,  and  then  throw him headlong  into a vortex?  Hard  to say.

If   you  are the  kind  who loves  abstract  thrillers,   go for The  Game,  only  allow  yourself  multiple  viewings,  to actually  unravel the layers it has.   This is not  a straightforward  Man on the Run,  thriller,  it is  a much  more  complex  and  mysterious one.   My  reason  for  watching   The  Game,  was a  discussion  i had with a friend  over No Smoking.   She  was a huge  Michael Douglas  fan,  and   she  said,  that  No  Smoking  had  some  of  The Game’s  influence,  especially  the  surrealistic nature of the plot.   It  took me  a couple  of  viewings   to get  some  part of  the movie,  but still  lot to be explored.    Michael Douglas  is  first  rate  as the  Scrooge,  who gets  drawn into a  crazy  series  of events,  while  Sean Penn  is  equally  effective  as  his  free spirited rebellious brother.   

If  any one  has  watched  this movie,  would  love to hear their  perspective on it.

Tags: David Fincher, Michael Douglas, Sean Penn, The Game, World Cinema
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share this Blog!   »    Tweet This!
  •     Facebook
  •     MySpace
  •     Digg it!
  •     Add to Delicious!
  •     Stumble it
  •     Print this article!

Related Posts

-  David Fincher, Dark & Stylish-I
-  David Fincher & “ The Curious case of Benjamin Button”
-  Benjamin Fincher Button
-  Zodiac : David Fincher’s okey dokey ones
-  90 minutes of cinema. are you game?
-  The Surprising “Numbers” Game
-  Game Over : Blu-ray it is
-  Inland Empire – David Lynch’s strangest yet!
-  David Dhawan : some observations over the years
-  David Dhawan-The remake King

11 Comments

  1. ravptor ravptor says:

    I could never finish the film for some reason. It bored me to death especially the beginning.

    NS influenced by Game, Did I hear that before? Hmm…

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  2. oz oz says:

    One of my all time favorites. My first exposure to Fincher’s story telling. The climax where the gun slips from the hand, the dark sky, people rushing to Penn, crying, sobs and in all that the utterly defeated Douglas, all his facade and whatever ego he was still holding on to… melting away as he takes “that” step… the culmination of the entire story into that scene – loved it… it’s a pity that climax was so wrongly misused in BluffMaster… same scene just such a diagonally opposite impact.

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  3. oz oz says:

    Another one – the scene in the beginning of the movie, where Douglas is unable to open his briefcase… that is the beginning of Fincher’s sleek and sublimal way of showing how a man always in “control” starts losing it (control) bit by bit, situation by situation as things get bigger and bigger beyond his grip… I particularly liked how this is represented through various supporting elements… like the briefcase becomes another major problem for Douglas right after he takes it back to his hotel room (after he can’t open it)… there he manages to open it (don’t remember how) and voila… another pack of headaches pops out when he sees what’s inside the case…

    I found it very sleekly and intelligently written right at the story level.

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  4. Steve Steve says:

    Ah, yes, David Fincher’s most underrated film!
    I really liked it.
    Was innovative.

    I can’t say that I can see the ‘No SmOKing’ references, but it has been around 10years since I saw the film!

    I remember it not being appreciated, but I still went out and got the VHS!

    I can’t understand why people dislike it.

    Wasn’t ‘Bluffmaster’ inspired by this?

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  5. Steve, Bluffmaster was inspired from the Nicholas Cage starrer Matchstick Men. But the climax had shades of The Game.

    Oh well the No Smoking funda was that both movies had a same concept, of a guy being thrust into a world, where he is forced to change the way he is.

    Well also regarding the movie, it has a kind of abstract and surrealistic narration, needs repeated viewings to actually get the gist of it. I think thats why this movie was a flop. But really loved it.

    UA:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  6. Oz, actually Douglas places the briefcase in the hotel room. After he comes back, to hotel, he finds that the room has been totally vandalized, and then he sees the briefcase cracked open, with all those pictures in it. He suspects it to be a trick played by Baer, the guy whom he threatened to fire. But when he confronts Baer, the guy has already resigned and is leaving.

    UA:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  7. Ravi, yeah its not an easy movie to like. First time it just went over my head, when i saw it. And then i saw it again and again, but while i cud understand it, still many questions remain unanswered. :)

    UA:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  8. ravptor ravptor says:

    Yeah, I actually have the film with me… will sit through this tonight. U piqued my curiosity.

    :)

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  9. rbehemoth rbehemoth says:

    Honestly I saw it once and though I liked it, dint think of it as an ‘Abstract Thriller’… Thought it was deep, yes… but not really hard to understand (I mean not in the sense of No Smoking or something). I really really loved the usage of “Jefferson Airplane’s White Rabbit” sometime in the middle when his entire house is seemingly sabotaged and all…
    Read about the back story of the song ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Rabbit_(song) ) in case you already dint know… It looked at Alice in Wonderland with the interpretation of it being an effect of Drugs induced hallucination and all. Absolutely LOVE that song.

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  10. rbehemoth rbehemoth says:

    aah… you would have to copy the part including ‘(song)’ from the above link (and ofc paste in URL :P ) for the correct address…

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  11. mudassir mudassir says:

    Well ratnakar, i have been fortunate enough to watch the Game and i do agree with u tht it actually perplexes us as the viewer….and makes u think about isolation,loneliness,craziness….

    It also makes u think that all of a sudden what sstarts happening to us and is everything really what it seems or is it a hallucination….

    Btw, this is the movie that actually got me hooked onto Fincher…. and today i have to admit that am actually a die hard fan of Fincher….

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Leave a Reply

:) :lol: :rofl: :banginghead: :witsend: :yahoo: :wacko: :bow: :glasses: :notsure: :roll: 8-O :twisted: :cry: :cool: more »