Halla Bol – Sure, but Some Other Way!

Padmaja Thakore
Padmaja Thakore   | Review | January 16, 2008 at 1:11 pm


Rajkumar Santoshi has made several films that address social issues in a certain way. His celebrated films – Ghayal, Damini, Ghatak, Pukar, Lajja – carry strong messages, feisty characters and dialogues that get a good share of so called “front benchers’”claps and whistles. As we are no less eager to champion films with their ‘hearts in the right place’, these films have often found their share of audience and acclaim.

In his latest flick, Halla Bol (possibly returning to safer grounds after the failure of Bachchan-starrer and gangster drama, Family), Santoshi takes on a number of high profile crimes to highlight corruption and public apathy. Enthused by the extraordinary public interest and support in Jessica Lall murder case, he promotes public outcry (Halla Bol) as a panacea for all ills. This is problematic premise to say the least; however, does the film bear out what it has set out for itself? No. The reliability of the masses is questioned in the film itself when they are incited into protests and violence by a corrupt politician and his goons. The film does not even pretend to show how any mechanism of public involvement can be created (surely, amateur street theatre is not enough), debates held and the public won over for action. Of course, this leaves out any possibility for addressing finer issues, for e.g. how ‘neta’ and ‘janta’ necessarily cannot be tightly compartmentalized into two separate entities, for many amongst this ‘janta’ would be as corrupt if in power. The problems in premise, not surprisingly, spread neatly into the quality of the film.

The first half hour has all the ingredients of a B-film – from the opening scene between the biographer and Sameer Khan (Ajay Devgan), to the dismal item number, to the caricatures of real-life characters (Vijay Mallya?, Sri Ravi Shankar?) in their sad get-ups, to a murder straight from a horror fick, and a z-grade montage of Sameer Khan’s personal and professional exploits, not to forget strange expository set of dialogues between Jackie Shroff and Mukesh Tiwari.

Just when the film would have reached the point of no return, Pankaj Kapur does a superman, and, within a span of two earthy lines, that he drums out while performing a street play, he, single-handedly brings the film back into the game. As one watches him sing the Harishchandra fable, it is a different cinema from what we started with. From then on the Halla Bol goes into highs and lows but manages to stay away from the initial (with-great-potential-for-straight-to-video) debacle.

A major problem with Halla Bol is how the protagonist Sameer Khan is sketched out. The reversals in his character, from an idealist to a “practical” person and then back to an idealist position, are dealt with superficially. From a theatre actor who cries when his teacher gives him a tiny steel trophy to a superstar who cheats, lies, exploits young actresses and insults the same teacher, and then returns to being a righteous person who sacrifices fame and his career to fight for one wronged girl – Sameer Khan shows no psychological depth. If you are championing his cause it is because you came to the theatre already convinced of civil rights and not because the protagonist persuades you to. How can he? Khan is more a picture of weakness once he takes the right cause – he is often crying, pleading with other witnesses, or trying to protect his family with a miniature ‘kataar’, and for some reason stupidly standing with his wife (Vidya Balan) and child just behind the main door of his otherwise huge mansion as rioters threaten to bring it down. The boldest, bravest thing Sameer Khan can do is piss in his enemy’s house (which makes his enemy pull down the entire structure; it is difficult to say which one of them is more absurd?).

The dialogues have a retro feel to them, with an alliteration that would shame Kader Khan, and are spoken in a theatrically frontal composition. The film has been cut to a false pace and several quick, superficial scenes race through, that hinges either on a fake punch line, or an odd plot twist. Add to this several poorly planned and executed scenes (no, we are not done with B-film elements yet): there is Kill Bill-esque swordfight between some goons and Pankaj Kapur (somewhat saved by the latter’s concluding expression), or the lathi charge on Sameer Khan with strangely dancing police and media figures, or for that matter the ‘summary execution’ of the culprits in the end (a variety of “going kaput” expressions are played out by half a dozen antagonists as guilty verdicts are pronounced on them – I suspect, in time to come, they will be appended together for one of the bakra awards on MTV).

I sincerely invite Rajkumar Santoshi to create something as delightful as Andaz Apna Apna. As for the reason why most of these ‘social issues’ films can’t come up with attractive, workable solutions, I have a theory – because they fail to identify the problem. Only with clarity on the real problem will come the right or at least reasonable solutions. And it is not my place to help them with that.

- Padmaja Thakore

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share this Blog!   »    Tweet This!
  •     Facebook
  •     MySpace
  •     Digg it!
  •     Add to Delicious!
  •     Stumble it
  •     Print this article!

Related Posts

-  HALLA BOL- Mr. Santoshi Delivers What Is Expected
-  Halla Bol aka Hollow Bol
-  Much Halla About Balls
-  Halla Bol Review: Conscience, Goregaon-Style!
-  Halla Bol: What Price Fame?
-  Halla Bol: Mere Paas Gurda Hai
-  HALLA BOL
-  I wanna be deaf again!
-  i love to be a performing Artist
-  Traffic Signal – better drive down Mumbai’s Linking Rd.

11 Comments

  1. Anand G Anand G says:

    Ah! The best review of Halla Bol comes from outside the RONIN contest. I agree with every word Padmaja.

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  2. kavita kavita says:

    and I concur Anand!

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  3. P(L)AYBACK P(L)AYBACK says:

    Kavita,…Bombay to Bangkok :P

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  4. kavita kavita says:

    Just ‘Bombay to Mumbai’ SPB.
    I concur that this is written exceptionally well.

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  5. udai udai says:

    Excellent review. I loved this part- “The boldest, bravest thing Sameer Khan can do is piss in his enemy

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  6. kartik shah kartik shah says:

    good review. keep it up

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  7. Neeraja Neeraja says:

    excellent review Padmaja. Agree on most points especially the point: “they fail to identify the problem.”
    I feel street theatre(whether it works in reality or not) was a nice idea.

    No mention of the performances? I liked Pankaj Kapoor and Vidya Balan.
    Also the guy who says “Sameer khan mast aadmi hai, tu bhi halla bol” towards end. :D

    “jis desh ke rashtrapati Abdul kalam ek musalman hon, pradhaan mantri ek sikh ho…”
    err…a case of bad hindi or ignorance?

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  8. Kartick Kartick says:

    Dear Padmaja,

    If only we could translate this clarity into a forward process, we’d have much better films coming out every Friday. Hoping we find more writers who have that ability…

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  9. ishan ishan says:

    Dear Padmja.
    Many thanks to write something as bold as you did. Rajkumar Santoshi seems to have lost his touch to the reality in this movie. Films are often made to make bold statements. But then one has to be extremly careful while doing so on two acounts- first the nature of the statment and second then magnitude of the boldness. The film does not seem to bother about anything, Neither of its content nor of its craft.
    ishan.

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  10. Inca Inca says:

    I thought even Darshan Zariwala was pathetic. Santoshi was way off in casting here. Darshan was nowhere near menacing. He didn’t seem to have any clue about being slimy and took out his stock, sitcom-days facial contortions.

    And the writing was pathetic – Santoshi could be thinking he’s a cowboy at penning but his writing abilities are non-existent. In Khakee, he did have a proper writer in Sridhar Raghavan but he stands exposed.

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  11. Faraaz Faraaz says:

    the best review so far!! very well written!!

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Leave a Reply

:) :lol: :rofl: :banginghead: :witsend: :yahoo: :wacko: :bow: :glasses: :notsure: :roll: 8-O :twisted: :cry: :cool: more »