I am Shiva, the God of Death

Ratna
Ratnakar Sadasyula   | Movies | March 31, 2009 at 9:09 am


shiv

“…now I am become Death [Shiva], the destroyer of worlds…”

Physicist Robert Oppenheimer, Supervising Scientist of the Manhattan Project

Michael:  You are a manic  depressive

Arthur: I’m  Shiva the  God of  Death.

/**  Disclaimer Alert

In   Hindu  philosophy,   Shiva  is  considered  the  destroyer, the  God of  death.   Some  one who  takes  upon the  task  of  cleansing the world of  it’s   evil  elements   as  Rudra.  And  yet  he is also  worshipped as the benevolent,  and  giver of  boons.   In  the  Indian  context,   death  and destruction is  something  associated  with  Shiva.  A  God   who is  peaceful,  tranquil,  and   yet  when  provoked  into a  rage,  goes on  a cosmic  dance  of  destruction of  death.

mcSet  in a  parallel,  legal   universe  in the  US,  Michael  Clayton,   invokes  the   imagery  of   Shiva,  not   just  in  that  reference  by  Arthur(  Tom  Wilkinson),  and   Michael  Clayton( George Clooney)’s  remark  in  the  climax.  If  we   take  the  US ,  the  legal  fraternity   is a  world  of  it’s   own,  it  has  its  own  heroes, villians,  gods  and  demons.   In  a  way  its  a mini  universe  of  its  own,  with  its  own ideologies,  philosophies  and  protagonists.  People  like  John  Grisham,   made  an  entire  career  penning  novels  on  this.   Some of  the   greatest  classics  of   American  cinema  like  To  Kill a Mocking Bird,  12  Angry Men,  And  Justice for All,  The Verdict  were  based on  a  legal  backdrop.   And  in  this  legal  universe belongs  Michael  Clayton.

Clayton  however  is  not  your  friendly  neighbourhood  lawyer,  fighting  for  justice  and  the  underdog.   He  is  more  of  a fixer,  the man   who  takes  on  the  dirty  job  of  cleaning  up  the  fallout from other  cases.    If  you  want  some  one  to  do the  dirty  job  of   erasing  names  from  a list,  or getting  permits  or  greasing  the palms of  the  law,  he  is  the man.  Michael  is  the  man  who  makes sure  the  prosecutors   garnering  the limelight,  dont  spend  their  time  bothering  about  the  back end work.   As he  says  of  himself  “I am  a  fixer! i am a bagman”.

For me  when  i  first  saw  Michael  Clayton,  and  heard  the  reference  to  Shiva,  i  felt  maybe  director  Tony  Gilroy,  just  wanted  to  put it  as a  statement.  But  repeated  viewings  later,  some how  just  see  a lot  more   metaphorical  references  here.   And  it  starts  off  in  the  opening  scene  itself.   I  would  rate  this  as one  of   the   best  opening  scenes  ever,   love  the  way,  Gilroy  uses   a  series  of  shots  along  with  Arthur’s  VO   to  depict  something  building  up.   The  VO   here  is  absolutely  critical,  because  thats  where   the  director   slowly  sets  up  the  story,  we  know  that  Arthur   is  desperately  seeking  out  Michael’s  help.  And   the  way  director   places the VO  in  context  of  what  is  being  shown,  is  brilliant.  So  you  have  Arthur  speaking  about  “speed of  madness”  on a  camera  shot  of  a  xerox  machine  cranking  out  high  speed copies,  and only  the  name  of  the  firm  is  visible.    Working the  graveyard  shift  in  an  organisation  can be  scary  at  times,  you are all  alone,  surrounded by  empty  cubicles,  and  long dark corridors,  and   the  camera work  here  gives  out  precisely  that  feel.  In  a way the  VO  metaphorically  emphasizes  the  point  that  Arthur  feels  trapped  and  lonely,  he  wants  to  speak  out  to Michael  why  he did it.   What  others   perceive  as  an  act  of   insanity   is  for  him  liberating  himself  from  an  oppresive  universe.

Arthur  refers  to  Michael  as  “Keeper of  Hidden  Sins”   in the opening   lines,  again  a  reference to   Shiva,  storing  the poison,  a metaphor  for  all  the  sins  of  the  world, in  his  throat.   Michael  being the  fixer,  the  janitor  is  privy  to   the dirty  secrets  of  the  firm’s   clients.    Surely  one  of  the  best  opening  credits  ever.

And  then  the  VO  and  credits  stop,  as  we  get  into  the  action.  But  director  Gilroy  already  achieves  the  purpose by  then  of  getting  me  involved  into  the  drama  and  intrigue.   And  where is  Michael  Clayton?  Again  another  brilliant  piece of  shot  taking,  as  the  camera  slowly  moves  up  from his  personal  belongings  to  show  Michael   in  a Chinese casino.   Michael  is  not  God,   in  fact  he never  even  imagines  himself  to be  so  for  quite  some  time.     He  has a  gambling  problem,  and  is  seriously  in  debt  to  a  loan shark.   After  meeting  a client  who  has  fled  from  an  accident  scene,  he is  driving  along  the  road.   At  one   place  he  stops,  just  to  take  a look  around  the  countryside,   for no apparent  reason,  maybe  find  the  purity  which  he has never  seen in  his   career,  dealing with  all kinds  of scum.    And   as   he  is  enjoying  the  country  air  around  him,   his  car  explodes,  saving  him  from  death.  Yes  as  they  say  a  Mrityunjaya,  the  conqueror  of  death,  Clayton  here  just  escapes  from  his  own  death.    And  as  Clayton rushes  towards  the  car,  we  get  involved  in  the  story  deeper.  Why  would  some one  want  him dead?

mc1And  thats  when  we  come  into  the  intrigue  laden  drama.    Arthur  is  one  of  the  top  most   attorneys   with   Keener, Bach and Leeden,  a  leading  New York  legal  firm.   In  the  midst  of a  crucial  deposition,  Arthur  has  a sudden  mind  seizure,   and   has  streaked  in  front  of  everyone,  which  is  what  the  opening VO  refers  to.    As  we  see  Michael  learning  about  Arthur’s   act,   his  VO  again  comes  into  the picture,   again  the  reference  to  Shiva’s   storing the  poison  in  his  throat

…Six years, Michael! Six years I’ve absorbed this poison! Six years –four hundred depositions — a hundred     motions — five changes of venue –
eighty-four thousand documents in
discovery!

The  poison  that   Arthur  refers  to  here  are  the  deathly  secrets  of  U-North  a large   agricultural  products  conglomerate,  which has been  marketing  a spurious  herbicide, that has been  causing  the deaths  of  people  around.   The  scene between  Arthur  and  Michael  in  the  prison  gives  an  in sight  into  the  problem  being  faced, as well  as  the  divergence in the outlook  of  the  two.  Michael  feels  that  Arthur  has  become  manic,  become  depressive,  while  for  Arthur   its  a way  of  assauging  his  conscience.  Arthur  has been  the man   who  was  part  of  the  system,   but  at  some  time  he  had to break,  considering  U-North’s   shenigans.

mc2And  that  brings  us to  the  3rd   angle  in  the plot, Karen  Crowder(Tilda  Swinton), the  ruthless  legal  counsel  for  U-North.  Karen  is  shocked  after  watching  the  video  of   Arthur stripping away,   and  confronts  Michael  about  the  utility  of   hiring  Arthur  as a  defense  counsel.   And it  does not stop  there,  she  snoops into Arthur’s   briefcase to find  out  that  he  has  the  information, that could  damage  U-North’s  credibility  further.   She  sets  men to go  after him,  tap  his  phones  and  get  him killed.   Michael  is  the one  wanting  to protect  his  friend  Arthur, while  Karen  finds  him  too  dangerous.

It  is  this  fascinating  interplay  between  the  characters  that  makes Michael  Clayton  a  cut  above  the  standard  legal  thriller.    Barring  the  car  explosion  scene,  there  is  not  much  physical  action  in the movie.   The  tension  comes  out  from  the  way  Michael,  Arthur  and  Karen,  indulge  in  a 3 way  chess game,  each  trying  to outwit  one  another.    The  scenes  showing  the  way  the  surveillance team taps  the  phone  of   Arthur  as well as one of  the  plaintiffs  Anna is  chilling.  Its  as if  what  you  say  could  be  used  against  you.    Michael   Clayton  has  shades  of   Insider,  where  Russel  Crowe  testifies  against  his  own  tobacco  company,  and  Al  Pacino  wages  a  battle  to  help  him  out.  We  see that  especially  in the  scene  where   Michael’s  boss  Marty( director  Sydney  Pollack)   gets a  deal  with  him,  to  turn  over  Arthur  in  return  for  Michael  getting  the money  to  clear  his  debts  off.   Marty  can’t   afford   to  let  Arthur  go  against  U-North,  it  has  been  their  major  client.

Michael   Clayton  also  has  fabulous  performances  the  best  of  the lot  being  veteran  actor  Tom  Wilkinson  as  Arthur,  especially  in  the   prison  scene  where  he  talks  to  Michael.  You  can  feel  his helplessness,  his  anger  at  the  corrupt  system.   Tilda  Swinton  equally  brilliant  as  Karen  Crowder,   cold, ruthless, unfeeling.   George  Clooney   is as  usual   good  in the  title  role,  of a  fixer,  who  needs  to  go  against  the   very  system  he  has  been   part of.   Michael  Clayton  has   been  criticized  for  being  too slow  paced  and  wordy,  but  this  was  a movie  that  needed  it.  Its  a movie  that  takes  its  time  to  set up  the  characters,  get  into  their  motivations  and   then  their  interplay in a  gray  zone.   It  is a  movie   that  takes  us  into  the  gloomy, dark  recesses  of  the legal  universe,  where  there  is  no  black  and  white,  but  only  grey.

Tags: George Clooney, Legal Dramas, Michael Clayton, Sydney Pollack., Tilda Swinton
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share this Blog!   »    Tweet This!
  •     Facebook
  •     MySpace
  •     Digg it!
  •     Add to Delicious!
  •     Stumble it
  •     Print this article!

Related Posts

-  Suraj Ka Satavaan Ghoda, Fallen Angels or Shiva – Takeaways Infinite..
-  RGV’s Shiva 20 years Back
-  Death : An absolute truth that changes everything
-  Death along the Green Mile
-  DEATH OF ORIGINALITY
-  The death of a director…
-  Death in our films
-  Now I am become Death, destroyer of worlds
-  The Death of Indian Television
-  The death of a movie critic..

15 Comments

  1. roodrow roodrow says:

    Perhaps the best legal thriller I’ve ever seen.

    My favourite:

    Michael: “I am not the enemy”.
    Arthur: “Then…who are you?”

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  2. Jaiganesh Jaiganesh says:

    Amazing film..
    what about the father son angle in the movie between Michael Clayton and his son. The comic that the son keeps reading.

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  3. Raghu Raghu says:

    Irony, my friend.. irony.. I am writing an article which will hopefully be on PFC soon.. almost the same title… :)

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  4. @ VPJ

    You mean Realm and Conquest, but i think that was more like a fantasy novel. In fact it was created by Gilroy just for the movie. It was some kind of metaphor for truth and justice, which was the same topic in the said book.

    UA:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  5. @ Roodrow

    The dialogues are a cracker in the movie. Give it to Gilroy, who had also written the scripts for the Bourne Trilogy.

    Any idea about Gilroy’s latest flick Duplicity?

    UA:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  6. @ Raghu

    I am looking forward to your article. :)

    UA:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  7. MindTentative MindTentative says:

    Raghu..Go ahead and publish. Title does not matter!

    Ratnakar, Nice article.

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  8. ~uh~ ~uh~ says:

    Undoubtedly, one of the most intense legal drama film I have seen. You review, as usual gives great insight for the movie.
    However, you have not touched upon the ‘Realm & Conquest’ context, the kid’s dark conversations with Arthur and the resemblance of scenery horses atop a hill)with the book, where Micheal’s car explodes. I think it was a metaphor too.
    ‘Do I look like I’m negotiating?’ what a delivery!
    The opening VO transcript is available in wikiquote .

    cheers!
    ~uh~

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  9. Sridhar Mayur Sridhar Mayur says:

    Very written piece on Michael Clayton, has to be in my favourites.

    I truly loved George Clooney and a great performance by Tilda Swinton which won her the Oscar for Best Performance by an Actress in a Supporting Role, she is so different from the ‘The White Witch’ in The Chronicles of Narnia…

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  10. @ UH

    Well yes i was mostly concentrating on the Michael, Tom and Karen, did not really look into this aspect. Yep Henry’s conversations with Tom, especially on the Realm of Conquest fundaes were pretty much metaphorical in their way. Opening credits have to be one of the best i have seen.

    @ Sridhar

    Yeah, great performance from Clooney, but loved performances of Wilkinson and Swinton more. Especially Tilda Swinton in a real super bitch character.

    UA:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  11. Ravi Ravi says:

    Poison … Shiva.

    /me bows for your passion for cinema. :D

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  12. deepak deepak says:

    The VO has to be heard in 5.1 :) . Some people say the story of the film is too simplistic and that Clooney played his usual sauve manner with that same black suit and unshaven look. But in some scenes his acting skills really showed. The film also captures the coldness of the Corporate culture with all the Snow scenes and empty hallways and drab buildings. Simply an awsome movie. I see it whenever it is aired on Star movies.

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  13. @ Deepak: VO in 5.1?? Don’t get u here. Anyway the story is not simplistic, its quite multi layered IMO, too much of Grisham has spoilt audiences. And yes the dark, gloomy tone, emphasizing the corporate culture, really makes this so awesome.

    UA:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  14. Raghu Raghu says:

    Thanks for the encouragement, Ratnakar and MindTentative.. PFC published it.. here it is:

    http://passionforcinema.com/now-i-am-become-death-destroyer-of-worlds/

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  15. blargh blargh says:

    First of all, Shiva is the God of destruction. The god of death is Yama. Secondly, that quote is not a reference to Shiva or Yama. It would make no sense in the context, since the person speaking those words in the Bhagavad Gita is Krishna, the incarnation of Vishnu. The word used is the word “death” or more accurately “time.”

    Krishna is trying to explain how God is great and that He is eternal. So, the reference to death, or time is to show that God can survive all changes, even something as final as death or as all encompassing as time. The whole verse translates like this:

    “If a thousand suns were to rise on the horizon at once, such would be the magnificence of his glory. For I am world altering Time/World destroying death.”

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Leave a Reply

:) :lol: :rofl: :banginghead: :witsend: :yahoo: :wacko: :bow: :glasses: :notsure: :roll: 8-O :twisted: :cry: :cool: more »