• Jahan Bakshi

  • Published: on May 21 2007 @ 12:30 pm
  • Popularity: 88 views
« GAMES BOLLYWOOD PLAYS | Home | subtitillation »


Slammed-e-Ishq!

Looking back: Why did Nikhil Advani’s love-vehicle crash?

They say it is fruitless dwelling on the past. Besides, the film I am writing about is by no measure whatsoever, one of my favorites, or even one that I consider extraordinary. But ever since it released and especially after I recently watched it, I just can’t help but wonder- what went so horribly wrong with Salaam-e-Ishq - a film that seemed like a guaranteed blockbuster, a surefire super hit? How did the firecracker go kaput, the bang unexpectedly replaced by a whimper?

It is often said these days in the industry that it is virtually impossible to judge the fate of any film- and I have to say, that in my humble and frank opinion- that is nothing but a whole load of bull***t. It is not always very difficult to judge how a film will fare once it nears release- and in fact, quite easy after its first screening. You don’t have to be a ‘trade analyst’ to sense a film’s buzz, just an observant film buff.

However; admittedly, sometimes one is really left stumped at a film’s unexpectedly dismal or superb performance. Remember, when two years back, Madhur Bhandarkar’s ‘small, offbeat’ Page 3, released and clashed with Showman Subhash Ghai’s lavish epic Kisna and literally pulled the carpet from under its feet, stole the march, and gave the ‘big’ rival film one helluva run for its money!

But then, Kisna had Viveik Oberoi- never really a BO draw- with a phoren babe and turned out to be a doddering, miserable drag, whereas Page 3, with its heady cocktail of realism, sex, scandal, gossip, sensationalism and lots of masala was impossible for audiences to resist. What does one say in explanation when a reasonably good, even entertaining film like SEI, with a high voltage star-cast, eye-catching promos and ear-pleasing, hit music falls like a pack of cards; rejected by audiences, ripped apart by critics?

I couldn’t see Salaam-e-Ishq when it released in cinemas, but having seen it now on DVD, I feel puzzled and strangely compelled to write in defense of a film that has been dumped as a ‘disappointment’ and dismissed as an ‘ode to mediocrity, not love.’ Nikhil Advani certainly did not deserve to be piled with such harsh criticism for his second directorial effort- flawed, but clearly a labor of love, actually (pun unintended). The film was savaged, and Advani’s directorial abilities even put to serious doubt, with many sneering and snidely remarking that how Kal Ho Naa Ho was actually Karan Johar’s one-man show, not Advani’s film.

I am not going to dismiss Nikhil Advani so easily- he is not a great director, not yet at least, but he sure knows his job well. He evidently is a good technician, and more importantly, can tell a story pretty darn well. He is certainly someone with potential, with enough talent for us to look forward to. Forget about bad, I don’t think Salaam-e-Ishq is even a mediocre film. In an industry that churns out such utter rubbish with amazing regularity- stuff like Fanaa and Krrish that become box-office smash hits and even manage a few good reviews, inspite of their obvious tawdriness and sheer lack of imagination- Salaam-e-Ishq certainly should be rated as much above average.

Advani is inspired by Richard Curtis’ mushy but irresistible episodic film Love Actually, but doesn’t borrow anything more fro it than the basic narrative structure of six love stories unfolding simultaneously. He also clearly takes inspiration from countless Bollywood films- there are numerous film references, including two old songs- Aao Huzoor and Babuji Dheere Chalna used to good effect in the film and two pesky journalists amusingly named Amar-Prem!

In fact, the way I see it- Salaam-e-Ishq is actually more of a cheeky homage to the Bollywood of both past and present- and not so much a ‘tribute to love’, as the tagline grandly proclaims. In a sense, it partly belongs to the genre of Farah Khan’s Main Hoon Naa, which was also a livewire, spoofy MTV-style entertainer taking cute digs at Hindi film yore. I enjoyed both these films- they are animated, bouncy and lively films with fizz- that never take themselves seriously at all- and don’t expect you to, either. They are also possibly our only counterparts to Hollywood’s Scary Movie and Date Movie series, or more recently Hot Fuzz and Grind house (though not nearly in the same league). They are campy, self-indulgent, yes, but also a load of fun. I recall when in an interview, Farah Khan was asked about the story of her film, she frankly and funnily replied: “Story? There is no story!”

Salaam-e-Ishq opens with the story of happily and inter-religiously married Tehzeeb and Ashutosh played by John Abraham and Vidya Balan. The story is pretty routine, with Tehzeeb’s accident and loss of memory, but is the many heartfelt moments between the couple that makes it rise above the ordinary. The actors share an uncommonly natural and oh-so-hot chemistry and imbue their parts with such tenderness, that you can’t help but feel for them. John effectively portrays Ashutosh’s desperation when Tehzeeb’s memory loss threatens to snatch her away from him. Anyway, if you still don’t like it, you can always gawp at gorgeous Vidya…and lose yourself in her eyes.

Akshaye Khanna plays a commitment-phobic guy in the second story, opposite Ayesha Takia playing his girlfriend and fiancée. This is where we have some of the most hilarious lines, but the rest is just okay…and predictable, of course. Akshaye is fabulous but does tend to overdo the wackiness at times, while Ayesha, despite a pleasing presence, doesn’t really have much to do.

In the third story, Anil Kapoor is a married and successful executive working in London married to a still-lovely Juhi Chawla. Bored of the monotony of his life, he inexplicably embarks on a clumsy affair with a young girl played by Anjana Sukhani. Anjana’s character- which seems part nymphomaniac seductress and part silly teen-is particularly unconvincingly written and acted and the whole affair bit seems quite weird and awkward. However, some funny moments and Anil-Juhi’s assured presence give warmth to the otherwise soppy story and make it somewhat engaging.

Govinda’s track is quite sweet, with him playing a filmi good hearted taxi driver who nurses equally filmi dreams of finding his dream-girl; a pretty gori mem. The story, of course is really cheesy and unbelievable, but also essentially a fairy tale, and is charming enough for us to forget our cynicism. Govinda puts up a good act, and while Shannon Esra is certainly not a blonde bombshell or the stuff dreams are made of, she sure has a nice enough screen presence and does her part well- this one makes you smile.

The Priyanka-Salman track in the film has been heavily criticized as the most ridiculous track in the film, but I really beg to differ- for that is exactly what it is meant to be- totally outrageous and outlandish. Deliberately whimsical and farcical, this tongue-in-cheek take on the film industry has Priyanka Chopra playing Kkamini, reigning ‘item-queen’ and wannabe ‘tragedy queen’ in order to bag the coveted lead in Karan Johar’s next film. She plans an elaborate publicity stunt to achieve this when ‘Raaoul’ alias Rahul (that is Salman) comes in the way. Priyanka is essentially the central protagonist of the story, and she plays the role with relish, appropriately hysterical and campy in a character designed to be over-the-top. This is actually a pretty good performance, with Chopra displaying great comic timing at times and doing a particularly amusing imitation of Meena Kumari. Salman dances to Tenu Leke like only he can, and smoothly sleepwalks through a role that really requires him to just be himself.

Lastly, the Sohail-Isha track is barely there, almost like a small collage of funny scenes- quite like the story of the two body doubles in Love, Actually. It is an endearing, cartoon-like track, with Sohail desperate to consummate his wedding and every attempt of his at getting naughty with his wife going riotously wrong. Sohail Khan and Isha Koppikar bring the house down (literally, in the film) and though their almost Tom and Jerry kind of segment could be perceived as crude, I just find it cute.

The film keeps changing tracks every now and then, and the way the scene/story transitions take place is often quite innovative. Salaam-e-Ishq is well shot- the frames are beautiful and well crafted without being irritatingly sugary or picture perfect which is often the case in Bollywood romances. The music is peppy, catchy and the best we have seen of late from Shankar-Ehsaan-Loy, and while it is not groundbreaking in any way, it is enough to make you groove to its beat. The writing and dialogue flutters between the witty and the (deliberately) cheesy- and is never self-conscious.

Salaam-e-Ishq is a mostly fun ride- even if a tad too long- which makes it ultimately a little exhausting. And for its sheer audacity, cheek and madness, I give Salaam-e-Ishq a thumbs-up. So while I can’t find any real reasons why no one liked it, I just hope the filmmaker keeps his next film shorter and possibly edgier and more atypical, unusual and different. He’s good, but I just guess he’ll have to be better next time round…whaddaya say, Mr. Advani?

Filed Under tags Movies
Make this blog-post famous »
  • IndianPad
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • MySpace
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google
  • Live
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Kirtsy
  • Mixx
Recommend this post!
1 readers recommend this post

Loading ... Loading ...
<strong>Email This Post To Friends</strong> Email This Post To Friends

Related Posts
  1. Salaam-E-Ishq: Sitaron kee Baraat !
  2. Salaam-E-Ishq : Analysis
  3. BAISCOPE presents… with Nikhil Advani
  4. Bollywood - A right word for Indian Hindi cineworld ?
  5. SEL n SEI and same old formulas
  6. Glorifying Govinda!!!
  7. sorry vishal but i love rekha bharadwaj…

 

15 Responses to “Slammed-e-Ishq!”

  1. manan katohora on May 21st, 2007 12:59 pm

    i agree…
    i liked everything about the movie…
    the songs - YA RABBA by kailash kher…
    the performances - especially akshaye, govinda
    white girl was good too :)
    priyanka was funny…

    salman was at his charming best…
    no matter what a small section of critics say about him - no one else can do what he does…
    and theres a reason he has survived for 18 years with maximum blockbusters…

    JMD - manan singh KATOHORA

  2. ritu bhatia on May 22nd, 2007 1:10 am

    I know why Salaame ishq was trashed…because it was an unbearable script. I saw it on my way from Pune in a volvo, and sadly there was no ecaping it. I couldnt jump out of the bus as the windows are sealed. And that is the sad truth of the film. I must say Nikhil Advani did a fair job in kal ho na ho, even if it was yet another KJO and Yashraj flick. Now that was entertainment, even if it was not great cinema. Salaame ishq was disjointed, random and made no sense whatsoever. I have seen love actually and though its too sweet and mushy for my taste, it was funny, worth a watch, the kind of light hearted film u’ll watch on a tired day back from work….and to blatantly copy that and make such a hash out of it proves a real lack of talent. Nikhil I think forgot that he was making a film, and somewhere along the line started to make a point. in which he failed miserably. he could not make a film, and could not make a point….

  3. Vikram on May 22nd, 2007 7:43 am

    What went wrong with the movie was
    1)The Length
    2)Too much importance given to the Salman-Priyanka track
    and
    3)Some of the songs were just not required.

    When i watched this movie in Adlabs,i suffered through it,but when i watched it on DVD and fast forwarded a cpl of dumb scenes and a cpl of songs,i really enjoyed the movie a lot.

  4. Tony Mera Naam on May 22nd, 2007 11:08 am

    I think that’s the tragedy of SEL was that had its moments, but they were too disjointed… the connections weren’t strong enough. Once you got into one story, another would pop up and then another… by the time you get back to the story you were first interested in, you’ve seen so much else that it takes you time to get back into it. And then it switches on you again. Add it that the length and by mid-second half your interested levels have dwindled.

    I think that’s why Honeymoon Travels and Metro worked better. Because the stories were running parrallel and were interconnected. Imagine if SEL had more interactions between characters.. if you could take different issues from different storylines and place them in the same scene. For example, near the end there were some very interesting and entertaining scenes where Priyanka and Anil meet at the cafe and actually bring out important facets of their stories. Same with John/Akshaye. But by then it was too late, our brains were too fried by trying to keep track of everything up to that point.

    Also, the climax.. I mean, what was Salman doing at the house? It was toooo much of a coincidence just to place him there for no rhyme or reason just so he and Priyanka could predictably meet and get together.

    If only the film “meshed” the characters and stories better…

  5. Sania on May 23rd, 2007 12:28 am

    I agree. b/w KHNH and SEI, I thought SEI was a far superior product.
    I hated everything about KHNH and could barely sit through the movie but yes SEI was surprisingly a pleasent film and one of the better films to come out last year.
    I didn’t like the Priyanka salman track though the best track with the best conclusion was the John Vidya track. The other tracks were so so. But the film overall was definitely enjoyable.

  6. Jahan Bakshi on May 23rd, 2007 1:38 am

    SEI released earlier this year, Sania…guess it already seems like history- wotsay?

  7. Jahan Bakshi on May 23rd, 2007 1:43 am

    “Also, the climax.. I mean, what was Salman doing at the house? It was toooo much of a coincidence just to place him there for no rhyme or reason just so he and Priyanka could predictably meet and get together.”

    Tony, you don’t get the point- al those predictable happenings and ‘coincidences’ are deliberate- their purpose is to actually cock a snook at typical hindi film tradition. Even the text- ‘Somewhere in the middle of London’, Somewhere in Delhi’ that appears in the film actually spoofs hindi films which are usually not er, very accurate about where the happenings take place..

  8. Phoenixnu on May 23rd, 2007 3:07 am

    just cut out the three tracks completly…salman-priyanka, anil kapoor-juhi and john-vidya…boring n nothing new. take govinda, akshaye and sohail’s tracks…it would have been so much fun n all new.

  9. RK on May 23rd, 2007 3:52 am

    Hey JB:
    “Somewhere in the middle of London

  10. Tony Mera Naam on May 23rd, 2007 2:28 pm

    I dunno Jahan, the film didn’t strike me as trying to be a “spoof”. I mean, “Main Hoon Naa” was both a spoof and a tribute, it was promoted as such and everything about the film reflected it. It wasn’t trying to take itself seriously. There were so many references and throwbacks.

    But SEL didn’t have that. First off, the John/Vidya & Anil/Juhi tracks are serious/dramatic. Even that one scene with Anil dancing with Anjana’s friends turned serious afterwards when Anil realized he doesn’t quite fit in.

    A good spoofs makes it obvious on what its spoofing - be it a character/scene/film or cliche. What references did SEL have? Besides the Priyanka track (more melo-comedic then spoofy, but I guess the “Raaoool” bit fits the bill) the rest of the film was actually trying to be something new.

  11. Jahan Bakshi on May 23rd, 2007 8:15 pm

    There are indeed many references, Tony- though most are not of a particular film, but Hindi cinema in general…

  12. Smriti Vij on May 26th, 2007 7:41 am

    i saw s-e-i in the balcony of a G7 hall in bandra first week sitting next to a woman in a burkha whose eyes were very moist by the end of it.

    I sat through it, because i loved the songs. i still do. the stories weren’t really heart rending, but the characters i felt were rather honest, some amount of detailing was visible in the film.

    what i feel went wrong with s-e-i - it got rejected by a generation that has grown up on love stories and possibly has had enough of it! but this is also a generation which is getting a chance to start talking and to fulfill it’s ambitions and it doesn’t need to believe that love solves all problems and that love is their only need - i feel the glorification of love, got them. actually, it was a film about romance, not even love.

    so, there go the romantics!

    So much, that even karan johar who nikhil advani worked with, is trying to make his films more ‘issue based’ whatever the issues he chooses might be..atleast the change is visible.

    nikhil advani spoke at a baiscope event before s-e-i - about how when they were rookies - ADs on Kuch Kuch Hota hai, they knew nothing of camera placement et al.so they brought in farah khan to shoot a song first and whatever they learnt was from her in 7 days flat! he admitted, some things stuck on in his mind — such as drama - round trolley! i feel this is quite visible in s-e-i…it’s a well choreographed film - a well choreographed collection of good songs but sometimes that too is a treat….if you have the time!

  13. sanitha on December 13th, 2007 11:41 pm

    Attn: Mr.Advani
    I am sanitha sivchandra from kerala. working as associate director in in documentary,advertisement,short films and telefilms for the last 4 years.
    I want to say something to u.so please conduct in this email.please.

    Thanking u
    yours faithfully

    Sanitha Sivchandra

  14. sanitha sivchandra on December 13th, 2007 11:44 pm

    My E mail id is - das_sanitha@yahoo.com

    thank u
    sanitha

  15. Shekhar Shimpi on December 14th, 2007 1:46 am

    I watched it for Ayesha Takia:x
    Liked the Govinda’s part(lovely)
    Overall,boring for me

Leave a Reply







(Ref smilies)

Our Comments Policy : The following kinds of comments are troll capped, blocked and/or commenter's identity reported publicly: Verbal abuse, personal attacks, hate statements, spam, trolls, advertising. Please assist us in keeping the comments clean. Use the contact form to let us know if you find unwarranted comments on PFC. Thank you.