Slumdog Millionaire - Questions/Glaring hole?
Disclaimer: Please avoid this post if you haven’t seen the movie. If you have, come and join in the fun.
Quite a few questions came to my mind after watching the Slumdog millionaire. One thing followed to another and we(PFC authors) started debating on some of the things in the movie. The debate came to an interesting point and we thought of sharing it with everyone. It runs down as follows:
Tanul Thakur:
Just watched Slumdog Millinoaire. The first fifty minutes blew me apart. Absolutely brilliant execution. It is both exhilarating and breathtaking. But, after that the film kind of digresses and it became one of the movies that could have been. I have some questions,
-Since Jamal is a street guy, and as we all know the questions asked to him during the show was a part of his journey. And since he is a street boy(young is the point I want to stress), we don’t expect him to pick any subtelities, the facts learnt by him during the period should be ‘told’ to him or experienced ‘first hand’. But, some of the answers told by him looks as if the incident involved the particular thing but I fail to understand how he extracted(or learnt) an answer out of that. For instance, I can still expect that 4,000 Ram Bow-Arrow question, I’m even ready to buy that Surdas waala bhajan(though there is no discussion regarding who wrote the bhajan,when he was with the gang, and I mean why would anyone? It is just a gang who wants to earn money. Or, is it when Jamal grows up he sees the things in that context? Blind children connection to Surdas?).
-Also, his answering that Benjamin Franklin question looked a tad forced to me. I mean first of all why would he give his begger friend $100, when it is not going to be of any immediate use to him? Why not give him a mere 1,000 rupees?(If the intention was to help him). Logical and common sense. And then the boy explaining to him about who is on the note, it again looked a tad forced to me.
-Then the question of who invented the pistol? Only an incident is shown with the gun and his brother involved. How can that be related as to who invented the gun? Who will give a gyaan about who invented the gun amidst all that tension? The point I reiterate is the answer was not ‘learnt’ by Jamal during the incident, as far as I know(If I missed something here, please tell me, my girl friend told something was mentioned!)
-Now, the most important thing. Probably everyone knows this but why did no one touched upon this when analysing the movie. The show ‘Who wants to be a millinaire’ is *not* a live show, so the whole phone call thing, Latika escaping, police arresting, and all that drama is just for the sake of being drama. I didn’t like that. People murder a movie when there is a slight flaw, but this is a gaping hole, in my opinion.
-Why, oh why, is the host of the show shown to be a cunning, two faced sly man? All the hosts of the show(Big B, SRK)put the contestants at ease. SRK occasionally took the case of contestants, but nothing as severe as what Anil does here. Why? Because, he doesn’t want another Slumdog to become a millinoaire? Just like him? So he gives him the wrong answer? Why? Regis Philbin was nothing like what Anil is shown here. This is not ‘Kamzor Kadi Kaun’ or ‘Who is the Weakest link’, and even in these shows the host would like the contestants to win, unlike our Main-Grey-Hoon-Kapoor.So I didn’t see any explanations for Anil’s behaviour. Totally escaped me. And more than that, it comes as a shocker when it is shown that Anil is the man who is responsible for Jamal’s arrest.
-How can you just arrest someone on the mere’suspicion’ that he cheated? Without substantiated proof?(Or, can you? Not very certain on this ground, but still, just arresting and giving 3rd degree on a mere suspicion seems like stretching it a bit too far!) I’m sure the show organisers makes sure that no one cheats. Why weren’t they questioned?
These are some question that didn’t leave me. I would appreciate and be able to see the movie in a better light, if someone answers those questions for me. The first half of the movie is like a breath of fresh air, but these questions just refuses to leave me. Academic? Over analysing? Boring?
I want answers!
Shripriya:
Tanul,
- the beggar master says something like “it is his favorite surdas bhajan”.
- he gave the beggar boy $100 b/c that was the note he was given when the driverwallah beat the shit out of him and his tourist buddies gave him the note.
- the bro says something like “my colt will kill you” or some such thing.
- live show thing - yeah. that’s why you need the “willing suspension of disbelief”
Why can’t the show host be cunning? It is a personality thing, not a show thing. It adds to the drama. If the host was a kind uncle type person where’s the added drama? Who cares if Regis and Amitabh are nice cuddly bears?? This guy isn’t and it makes it so much more interesting.
You can arrest anyone for anything if you are powerful enough in India and the person being arrested is a slumdog. That’s reality.
Tanul Thakur:
- One more point. Regarding ‘English’. Had they used English from start to beggining(as in, the characters conversing with each other), it would have been fine. Because, in that case, what it would have meant that the characters are just interacting, english is only a ‘medium’ to showcase what they are thinking/speaking. But, the movie wants us to see the young Jamal speaking in Hindi and couple of years later speaking in ‘correct english’ , that seemed more like a transition to me, without any proper explanation. How did he learn english during the period?( He could have, but the sudden turn around in the mode of communication didn’t sit pretty well). Same for his brother, Latika.
Tanul Thakur:
Shripriya,
Ok, I might have missed the point of the first three questions. But, I don’t quite agree with the ‘willing suspension of disbelief’, I didn’t went in expecting a fairy tale.
And why should the host be cunning? Just to add drama for the heck of it? Logically speaking, it doesn’t make any sense why would anyone want to piss the contestants off and jeopardise their own TRP’s(I may be taking it a bit too far, but still he didn’t ring very true and consistent to me). Zabardasti drame baaji, didn’t work for me.
Shripriya:
I think the suspension of disbelief is required to some degree to enjoy any fiction (here’s the history on the term - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suspension_of_disbelief)
The host doesn’t *have* to be cunning. But why should he be bland?? You think hosts are bland b/c of Regis. But why can’t a host be vicious and mean spirited - wanting to pull down others? He’s not pissing off contestants. He is two faced. So, to the contestant, he seems like a nice guy. But in reality, he only wants them to go “so far”, but no further. Let’s say Jamal believed him and picked B, Ricky Ponting. What would Jamal do later - say the host lied to me? Who’d believe him? So, the host has an airtight way in which to get him.
Now, as to why the host does not want someone to succeed… from what I could get it is that he’s a rags to riches guy and he wants to be the only rags to riches guy around (for now anyway). He doesn’t want someone else to take the glory, the press and the adulation that comes with such a story. Is that strong enough motivation? I agree that it seems a bit stretched, but still within the realm of possibility for me. [Edited to add: His TRPs are guaranteed even with someone getting that far - a win is not needed]
OM:
Tanul..i too had a problem, coz there was no explanation, as to what was the motive behind AK to be cunning…but, then i made myself believe that, he is an individual..and every individual behaves differently in different situation…so no explanation was needed..it is how you take it. Others are answered by shripriya pretty precisely…
If you notice the film carefully..all the answers given by him to the questions posed to him..had life changing experience wrt to jamal..and if YOU too had to list 5 things in your life..you wud remember somethinh which had an effect on your life and not wat u ate at a restaurant, nai? plus..it was destiny as was made clear at the begining it self
OM:
“Now, as to why the host does not want someone to succeed… from what I could get it is that he’s a rags to riches guy and he wants to be the only rags to riches guy around”
Shripriya..this could be a very interesting topic to discuss and i was talking about it with my roomie too…the chracter that AK plays..is lying so much or conning or being mean..so, it could also mean that he as well might not have been the rags to riches guy..it was just a way to fool..it could be either ways..hence i loved AK’s character so much..there is soo much ambiguity in it…its a trip.
OM:
“why should the host be cunning? Just to add drama for the heck of it? ”
why does the sun rise from east? why is garvity downwards? why are villians always mean? why does rama has to win against ravana?
its a story yaar…thats the way you projected your characters..
Tanul Thakur
I do get the fact about the Suspension of disbelief, but when the whole movie hinged around it(especially the climax), it was just a tad difficult for me to gulp. Anyways, thanx for the answers!
Mitch
Guys its magic realism. If your looking for logic you won’t find it.
It’s majorly influenced by Midnight’s Children and I think that Jamal will be a better Salim Sinai than even the authorized version.
Tanul Thakur
@OM: Yaar, I still believe that Anil Kapoor waala angle was kinda forced. They could have done away with that ambiguity. Had they only left at the host being cunning, it would have been still okay with me. But, Kapoor making sure Jamal is arrested is really stretching it a bit too far. I mean he is a millinoaire, why the hell should he be bothered about a slumdog?( Or, was it *this* eccentrity in Kapoor’s character they wanted to portray). Escaped me. Totally.
OM
” I mean he is a millinoaire”
that was not explained..how did you get that?
Tanul Thakur
He himself tells it in the bathroom. And is that too difficult to guess? A guy hosting Who Wants to be a Millionaire would surely be a guy with better standing!
Shripriya
@Mitch - oh yeah!! That is totally spot on. He would be a great Salim! I hope they pick him!!
OM
@ Tanul
“He himself tells it in the bathroom. And is that too difficult to guess? A guy hosting Who Wants to be a Millionaire would surely be a guy with better standing! ”
ahahha..that answers your question brother…its waht you let yourself to believe..it is waht Shripriya says about willingness to suspend urself…and the thing he says in bathroom..is what he says to Jamal…he could as well have been lying..but its your willingness to believe it..and as i said..it was ambiguity of that character…would you believ such a cunning man or not..that makes it so much more interesting…
not trying to convince you, which is not possible, not just to you but anyone with a different pov, but, certain things one as a viewer takes it for granted, others dont, and others accept it in the whole milieu of situation..and there are others who dont bother abut it as there is more of much more importance happening around
but i am loving this debate here…plssss tanul take this to the main..you can quote me as it is…
Tanul Thakur
@OM: It is not about what I want to believe but that is what things *are*. Why would anyone but a celebrity host a show as famous as Who Wants to be a Millionaire. He has to be a known figure and thus, a celebrity. Even if he hadn’t told this in the bathroom, would it have been too difficult to guess? Or, for that matter, who hosts(or have hosted) the ‘major’ game shows on TV? It is/has been the stars.
What is your take on the whole thing? The character of Anil Kapoor, the suspension of disbelief, or anything related to the movie. Let us know!
Filed Under
Movies , anil kapoor, Danny Boyle, Debate, Grey character., Slumdog Millionaire
18 Responses to “Slumdog Millionaire - Questions/Glaring hole?”
Leave a Reply
(Ref smilies)
Our Comments Policy : The following kinds of comments are troll capped, blocked and/or commenter's identity reported publicly: Verbal abuse, personal attacks, hate statements, spam, trolls, advertising. Please assist us in keeping the comments clean. Use the contact form to let us know if you find unwarranted comments on PFC. Thank you.
-
Advertisement
-
- Nothing found f
- PFCOne 2008 Da
- WTF is masakalli
- Dev.D Music Soundtrack Streaming R
- PFCOne 2008 Da
- Movie Marketing - The Telugu Cinema Way
- PFCOne 2008 Day Three
- Satyakam (1969) - Idealism vs Pragmatism
- Mickey Rourke & “The Wrestler”….
- Ye dosti…
-
Advertisement
Hottest Today:
Recent Posts:































I have’nt seen the movie..but could not resist skimmming through the post..for the gaping holes read the book..the linkages to all the 10 questions are well established there, though they are a tad bollywoodish and not entirely convincing..the book is ordinarily written so the screenplay is not gonna be tight..m sure the movie as such wud be much better.
Agree with Praneet. Reading the book would fill a lot of holes.
As for AK’s character, that is another hole in the screenplay that the book manages to deal with much more clearly. See, in the book, the AK character is a much more meatier character (the bathrooom sequence is very pivotal in the book) and is much more darker. Actually the book in itself was much more darker.
Like Praneet said, the book was cut out to be a Bollywood movie and seeing Boyle in the credits, I was hoping to see a much better movie than Slumdog turned out to be.
I think the subject/story would have been better served if the screenplay was to stick closely to the book.
I read the book a couple of years ago and then saw this movie. Maybe, now that you guys have seen the movie, you should try to read the book. I think you’d enjoy the book. It is evident that you have a lot of why’s floating around in your mind and the book will resolve all those questions nicely enough.
For me the only thing I felt hard to digest is after a person wins Rs. 2 crore, how can he sit all alone in the platform waiting for Latika?
That too with no media nothing (considering Indian media
)…and its only a few hours after he has won the show. Also no one seems to recognize him when entire India seems to have watched him win just a few hours ago.
For me the only thing I felt hard to digest is after a person wins Rs. 2 crore, how can he sit all alone in the platform waiting for Latika?
That too with no media nothing (considering Indian media
)…and its only a few hours after he has won the show. Also no one seems to recognize him when entire India seems to have watched him winning just a few hours ago.
I have seen the movie with great expectations and it was a huge disappointment. The novel is a mediocre material which has all hardcore Bollywood stuff, and after I have seen the movie I felt the novel far better. Regarding the gun scene, Salim only mentions its a “Colt Gun” and Jamal catches it, weird……….I have been following the Oscars for few years, and I ll be greatly disappointed and surprised if this movie gets into Oscars. I can’t understand why this average movie is creating such a buzz in Western media. I have always liked Danny Boyle’s movies (Tranispotting, Shallow Grave, 28 days later), but not this one.
and lots of things have been said about the screenwriter of this movie Simon Beaufoy and I found his oscar nominated movie “The Full Monty” average and for Slumdog his writing is below average………..apart from photography and music, I found nothing worth in the movie and regarding the last song when the credits roll, the dancing was pathetic to watch: compared to choreography standards of Bollywood……any day I ll watch Salaam Bombay than this ‘highly publicized movie’, if I want to watch a movie that deals with slums of Mumbai……
it’s a big goof-up that the show is “live” in India. but certain countries do air “who wants to be a millionaire” live. source:wikipedia.
The question for which i am looking for an answer is..how much does it affect the viewer in the process of watching the film in its enterity…to bask in the movie while watching it and to question it after you walk out, are two different things..if you were able to enjoy the film neglecting or over-seeing the holes in the script then, hey Boyle has done his job..he promised you what he delivered in those 2 hours..
here’s a great innerview of danny boy, and shooting in india etc. from The Onion.
http://www.avclub.com/content/interview/danny_boyle
@OM: There are several movies where I basked the entire thing without questioning. I think it all depends on the execution, if the direction is A class, the audience is sucked into believing what the director wants to show. Alfred Hitchcock said this to be ,where drama begins logic ends. For instance, in the movie Black Friday Dawood Ibrahim(Vijay Maurya) is shown to be wearing shades inside his house. At all times. Now, who would wear shades inside one’s house, but since the direction and pace was too fucking gripping, most of the audience ignored it. Also, it didn’t bother to anyone when analysing the movie in the long run. RGV also writes about 2-3 incidents from his movie, where he felt his execution overpowered the logical flaw in the story.
http://rgvarma.spaces.live.com/?_c11_BlogPart_BlogPart=blogview&_c=BlogPart&partqs=amonth%3d9%26ayear%3d2008.
He has explained this in an answer to the third question, giving examples from movies like Satya, Rangeela. etc.
@Anantha: Has the character of AK been developed more properly in the book? If yes, how?
Tanul- you should not search too hard for answers because as the movie tells you -
IT IS WRITTEN
I hope I am recalling correctly what Danny Boyle said at MIAAC. I think he said he originally wanted Ram to appear to Jamal on a rioter’s T-shirt, but it didn’t pop out enough, so he resorted to making Ram a “vision” that came to Jamal while he was running. That supports Mitch’s magical realism reading of the movie.
Did you really expect this movie to be completely factual and ‘tight’?
I mean come on, it’s not a Scorsese drama, it’s an adventure.
Can you do me a favor and slice up Batman for me too.
Tanul, it’s interesting to note how a mediocre, wannabe director like RGV compares to Danny Boyle…shooting in Bombay of all places, which supposedly is rgv’s ‘home turf’….Danny’s blown all these so called ‘realist’ Indian directors apart…
i agree with tanul regarding the colt question..salim hardly says colt properly n Jamal catches it..too much to believe.. in the book the host is not the reason for the heros arrest..the channel producers have a lot to do with it..n the host behaves in a mean manner due to the producers..
in the movie i dont think surdas was mentioned by maman..also i wasnt convinced by the chaiwala taking over the shift bit..n when the centers servicing scottish customers how come they have a software that lists down all the mumbai numbers..but still cant deny the fact that the movie still provided entertainment n worked for me..the book was filmi n even the movie was filmi
Grant that his experiences led Dip Stick to know all ten answers. Then the probability that those questions would be put exactly in the same order as the traumas occurred is about one in a million. Serendipity!