« The Fox is in Bollywood | Home | One Night in Mongkok »


The Last Lear: Bachchan’s best? Maybe, may be not, but….

This post is sponsored by

In a Shakespearean tragedy, one cannot but get sucked into the emotional cauldron. Be it Othello or King Lear or Macbeth or Hamlet, its all about great emotional upheaval when it comes to the core of the Bard’s plays. In Rituparno Ghosh’s The Last Lear, Amitabh Bachchan’s (as well as most of the cast’s) first full-fledged English role, Harish ‘Harry’ Mishra too is a character full of Shakespearean pathos. Quite naturally, it is but natural to expect that Harry’s character would draw you in with its raw emotional power.

Strangely, it does not happen, except in sporadic scenes. It is hard to say who is at fault – Bachchan or the script. Bachchan gives a performance that is one of his best, but even though there have been raving reports about this being his best-ever performance, there is actually nothing much that takes forward his histrionics from the point where he stood while doing Black.

Bachchan the star’s mannerisms threaten to peep through Harry occasionally, though to his credit, he has been able to hold them back to a great extent. We have seen so much of Big B the star that anything he does that does not fall in the category of the Bollywood hero (even when he plays the father of the hero, well, he is the ‘hero’, right?) makes us squeal in delight about it being a “groundbreaking” performance.

Harry’s is a character full of pathos – he suddenly left the stage at his prime when he was just a week away from doing his best role of King Lear, he lives almost a recluse, only shouting from the first-floor window of his Kolkata house at strangers urinating on the boundary wall. For him, nothing exists beyond the Bard, and cinema – well, it cannot even come near theatre. And when he does his first film, rather persuaded to do so by a serious director who gets to him through a journalist friend, he does it with great suspicion about the capabilities of film as a medium. But he slowly changes, adjusting to the needs of the medium, but still remaining a worshipper of the stage. As he says, “I’ll be good, simply because I cannot be bad, but your cinema won’t be good and that would make me look like a fool.”

Quite simply, it should have been a performance that you would carry with you forever, like you do Kamalahasan’s in Sadma, Dilip Kumar’s in Mughal-e-Azam or Naya Daur, Guru Dutt’s in Pyasa….. but except in patches, you fail to connect with the emotions of this Harry. You feel like getting one with him, but somehow it does not happen. Except when a dead-drunk Harry grovels before the director to allow him to perform a dangerous stunt, his Shakespearean accent giving way to Bengali-accented English, or when he teaches the model-turned-actress Shabnam (Preity Zinta) about finer nuances of acting, or when in the finale, he responds only to text written by the Bard himself.

I can only imagine how Utpal Dutt, who had written the play Aajker Shahjahan (Today’s Emperor) on which the film is based, and in which he had played the title role, would have brought alive the character on stage. Or, how stage masters like Naseeruddin Shah would have interpreted the character on screen. Here, you just feel like applauding Bachchan for taking up a role that is so different from what he has been essaying all these years, and for nothing much else. Stage actors like Adil Hussain and Barry John have done much better justice to characters weaned out of Shakespeare’s creations in Roysten Abel’s much-awarded play Shakespeare’s Othello In Black & White.

Instead of Bachchan, who seems to be taking away all the pre-release, media-driven accolade, have a look at Shefali Shah, as Vandana, the companion of Harry. A brilliantly-controlled performance is what she has delivered, as the woman who is utterly bitter at the way things have gone, and then slowly exposes her tender side as Shabnam and she discusses Harry over the night. Arjun Rampal, as Siddharth the serious film director, and Divya Dutta as Ivy the nurse are adequate, and just that. Jishu Sengupta, as Gautam the journalist, through whose voice the story unfolds, seems to be trying to hard to look intense, while Prosenjit as the co-actor in The Mask, the film in which Harry plays the protagonist, does not have much to do. Zinta surprises too, with her measured performance without allowing the usual bubbly self to emerge at all.

Ghosh’s film, however, has quite a few heroes in the technical department – as usual Abhik Mukhopadhyay (here his surname appears as ‘Mukherjee’) is in his elements is capturing the details of the characters and their surroundings, editing by Arghya Kamal Mitra is able to make the film interesting despite its slow pace, sound design by another Ghosh regular Biswadeep Chatterjee matches the other technical aspects and music by Raja Narayan Deb and Sanjoy Das is non-intrusive.

On the website of the Toronto International Film Festival, where it was screened last year, the film’s synopsis describes Bachchan’s as a master class in acting, and says like Richard Burton, Toshiro Mifune or other larger-than-life greats, he demands to be watched. Well…..

Filed Under tags Movies, Op-Ed, People, Review, Thoughts , Abhik Mukhopadhyay, Adil Hussain, Amitabh Bachchan, Arghya Kamal Mitra, Arjun Rampal, Barry John, Biswadeep Chatterjee, Divya Dutta, naseeruddin shah, Preity Zinta, Raja Narayan Deb, Richard Burton, Rituparno Ghosh, Roysten Abel, Sanjoy Das, Shakespeare, Shefali Shah, Toronto International Film Festival, Toshiro Mifune, Utpal Dutt
Make this blog famous ยป
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Turn this article into a PDF!
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • MySpace
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • MSN Reporter
  • IndianPad
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • FriendFeed
  • Print this article!

Related Posts
  1. Lear stirs, he lives…
  2. LAST LEAR;random thoughts
  3. Amitabh Bachchan: After 2000
  4. Hrishi Da and Amitabh Bachchan : Bemisal Jodi
  5. Amitabh Bachchan before 1995 : : Happy Birthday Mr Bachchan !

Recent Posts
  • Brothers : Trailer
  • Interview with Satish Kasetty
  • Ghajini : The iPhone Version
  • Deadgirl: Trailer
  • Philadelphia- Brotherly Love, 377 and Equality
  • Tribute to Tyeb Mehta
  • MIFF entry opens
  • Russian Film Fest in Delhi
  • Storyboarding… comes to PFC
  • Inglorious Basterds : Int’l Trailer
  • Hottest Today
  • Kailasa Chaandan Mein: R
  • Sankat City Review by Saeed Mirza and Kundan
  • Bhramaram – Helluva ride with Moh
  • FOR ADULTS ONLY – Virginity
  • Ed Norton-Aaron Stampler to The
  • Anurag Ka
  • DOORDARSHAN- DOWN MEMORY
  • Philadelphia- Brotherly Love, 377 and Equ
  • Interview with Satish Ka
  • 12 Responses to “The Last Lear: Bachchan’s best? Maybe, may be not, but….”

    1. krishna on September 11th, 2008 12:10 pm

      i feel that BIGB has given his careers best performance.

    2. Rusted rick on September 11th, 2008 1:42 pm

      hmmm…maybe it isn’t the masterpiece i was hoping it to be but still…. :)

    3. Nina on September 11th, 2008 2:35 pm

      I would hate to be the only person on the planet who found the film uninteresting, but I am just going to put myself out on a limb here and say it! I was a bit bored. Mr. Bachchan’s performance was very tiring to watch, not because it wasn’t good, but because I could see him working, working really hard and that made me feel exhausted for him… Of course, every seasoned actor dreams of doing Shakespeare’s Lear, so I understand the whys of taking on this role, but perhaps trying a bit less for the pathos and simply letting the character be who he is would have been more interesting to watch…

    4. Evelyn Tu on September 11th, 2008 3:50 pm

      Nina, I’ll join you. I only saw the first half at a festival screening, as I would not be able to get home from the train station if I had stayed any later. However, I was relieved to have found a valid excuse. I didn’t mind Amitabh’s bluster. He’s good at that. Preity’s, Shefali’s and Divya’s softer-spoken deliveries were more impressive, however. The sets, lighting and cinematography all approached the level of Khoya Khoya Chand. However, the men’s dialogues were complicated in a way that I just couldn’t make myself enjoy them. Is the second half any different?

    5. Carol on September 11th, 2008 6:44 pm

      LOL – Dilip Kumar in Mughal-e-Azam is great acting? Just curious. Maybe there is a different definition in BW.

      BTW, nice review.

    6. Rk on September 12th, 2008 2:25 am

      @Carol,
      LOL- just curious what definition of great acting you have read/seen/heard/known?
      and after definition if you have time please share some examples of great acting.

      It seems (atleast it can be assumed from your statement) that you even dont know the premise of Mughal-e-Azam ?

    7. parth on September 12th, 2008 3:26 am

      Well definition we are taught is watever Dilip Kumar, Naseeruddin Shah, KK Menon, Irrfan Khan amongst other few do is great acting!

    8. Rusted rick on September 12th, 2008 5:14 am

      @carol
      i think you re confusing Mughal-e-Azam with the recent maan gaaye mughal-e-azam and rahul bose with dilip kumar….lol

    9. Nina on September 12th, 2008 5:17 am

      @ Evelyn – Great to know I am not alone… And yes, I did like the women’s roles and deliveries. And no, the second half was more of the same… in my opinion of course!

    10. vishesh on September 12th, 2008 6:15 am

      @8 Rusted Rick:
      That was funny :-)
      IMHO, DK had a great oratory skill and way of speaking.
      Bose may be a good actor but his voice is not one of his strong suite, my thoughts.
      So if Carol really got confused between DK and RB, well then, Bollywood 101 is not a bad idea. Though I doubt that she did.

      We again go to perennial debate, what constitutes great acting? What works in one era may not work in the other one.
      What works in one context may look out of place in the other situations.

      I guess, Carol, if she may, elaborate on her p.o.v that would help.

    11. Carol on September 12th, 2008 9:20 am

      @carol
      i think you re confusing Mughal-e-Azam with the recent maan gaaye mughal-e-azam and rahul bose with dilip kumar….lol

      Very funny!!!

      I like some of DK’s performances but MEA was not great acting in my opinion. His performance was way over the top and actually was one of the few negative points of a wonderful movie. I tend to excuse the OTT style in old movies but in this case it was too distracting from my enjoyment of the movie.

    12. Utpal Datta on September 13th, 2008 8:55 pm

      Well written and evoking. Riruparna can create visually interesting frames but lacks in visual interpretation of the theme, crisis and contradictions of the characters and deep insight to his protagonist.

    Leave a Reply








    (Refer smilies)

    Our Comments Policy : The following kinds of comments are troll capped, blocked and/or commenter's identity reported publicly: Verbal abuse, personal attacks, hate statements, spam, trolls, advertising. Please assist us in keeping the comments clean. Use the contact form to let us know if you find unwarranted comments on PFC. Thank you.




    • Your Ad on PFC for 99cents a day!

      Subscribe to PFC eZine & Newsletter


       

      how do I blog on PFC?




    • Contribution List »

    • Featured Authors


    • Pankaj Advani