The Name of the Rose- Sherlock Holmes At the Abbey

Ratna
Ratnakar Sadasyula   | Movies, Review | March 9, 2009 at 7:19 am


 /**  Spoiler  Alerts

What  would  happen  if   you  take  Sherlock Holmes,  make him a  Francisan friar,  change  his  name  to  William of  Baskerville( yes the  same Baskerville  of   The Hound  fame),  and  make  Dr.  Watson  as a  young monk  called  Adso of  Melk,  and  put both of  them together  at  a remote  Benedectine  Abbey  somewhere in Italy?   Change  the  setting  from Victorian  England  to the  dark Middle  Ages,  of  the  Inquisition?   And  add  in elements  of    heretical  sects, Aristotle,  reason vs  faith, medieval  libraries   to  the mix?   Well   you  have  The  Name of  the  Rose  based  on   Umberto  Eco’s   novel  of  the  same name.

180px-nameotrose

The movie starts  off  with a voice over from Adso of Melk,  older and wiser now, as  he begins to narrate  what happened in 1327 AD in a remote Benedictine abbey  somewhere up  there  in the North of  Italy.  And  the movie cuts  to the  time period,  showing  a much  younger Adso(  Christian  Slater)   arriving at  the  abbey  along  with  William of Baskerville( Sean Connery) ,  to  investigate  what appears to be a suicide   that  has occured  at  the  Abbey.   During  course  of  time,   some other  deaths  occur,  and   things seem to be certainly amiss,  as they  run  into  a  series  of  characters.  

Salvatore  a  demented  hunchback,  who  speaks  a  lot of  gibberish,  in  all languages,   and  his mentor  Remigio  who  seem to be hiding  a dark  secret.   William  infers  that  having  been members  of  a heretical  sect,  they  could  have been  the  culprits.  The  authorities at the Abbey,  meanwhile  believe  this is a  case of   the  second  anti Christ  comming  and  that  a demonic  force is at work here.   William  who  believes in reasoning  and  logical  deduction,  as opposed  to  blind  faith,  neverthless  carries on with  his  investigation,   and  discovers  among other things,  a  labyrinthine  medieval  library,  at  multiple  levels  in  the  main tower,  which  has  been forbidden to visit. 

 

As he  digs  deeper into the mystery,  he  deduces   that  Aristotle’s   Second  Book  of  Poetics  has a  connection  with  the  deaths.  However  further  investigation is  hampered  when Bernardo  Gui(F.Murray  Abraham),   Inqnameofrose121uisitor,  arrives  at  the  abbey.   Gui  however  has  no  patience  for  reasoning  and  investigation,  and  believes  that  catching the  suspects and  torturing  them  would  reveal  the truth.  To  make  matters  worse,  Gui  and  William   had  clashed in the past too.   Gui  implicates  Salvatore,  and  a local peasant girl, of  nomadic  nature,  based  on  very  flimsy  evidence,  as  the  culprits.  He  tortures  Salvatore  to  confess  being guilty,  who in turn  implicates  the girl  as well  as his mentor   Remigio.   William  however  knows  that  the condemned  are innocent,  and  he is  now  in  a race against  time  to  find  the truth,  as  well  as  save  the   3 accused  from  being burnt at  the  stake.

Adapting a  work  like  The  Name of  the  Rose  to  the  screen  is  not  an easy  task,  the  original  novel  is  pretty  much  multi  layered and complex  book,  and  trying to  fit  that  into  2 hours  of   screen  time  could  be  certainly  ardous.  The  main challenge is  however  that  the book  is  rich  in  symbolism  and  semiotics.   What  Umberto  Eco,  does  in  the  novel,  is  work   around  the  multiple  meanings  of   word or symbol,  and  use  that as   a means  to arrive  at  the  end,  again  something  that  does  not  translate  well  into  the  screen.  To  the  credit  of  the  screen  writing  team  however,   they   stick  to  the  core  issues  raised by  the  novel,  though simplifying  the  original  plot.  It  also helps  that   director   Jean-Jacques  Annaud,   himself   had  an  interest  in  medieval  churches  as  well a  knowledge  of  Greek  and Latin.   The background  helps  in giving  the  authentic  look  for  the movie.   The   abbey,  the  simple  clothing  worn  by  the monks,  the  detailing of  the  abbey  traditions  everything  is  done  perfectly.   In  keeping  with  the  tone  of  the  story,  the  movie  has a  dark  feel to it,  as  the  camera often  glides  along  the  dimly  lit  passageways  and  the  monks  quarters.    Torino Deli Coli,  who  picturized  those  sweeping landscapes  for  Sergio Leone’s    The Good, The Bad and the Ugly,    creates  a  kind of  dark,  eerie  feeling,  keeping  in  mind  the  theme.  Most  of  the  camera  shots,    use an  interplay  of   light  and darkness,  to  create  the  dark  atmosphere.  

The  movie  is  not   an  easy  watch,   as   some  of   the  scenes  do  have a  kind  of   grisly  feeling.   The  scene  where  Salvatore  is  tortured  to make  him  confess  the  truth  is  quite  unsettling.  Not  just  the   depiction  of him being tortured  ,  but  the  fact  that  a demented  hunchback  like  him  could be  tortured  so  brutally,    makes  one  flinch  at  the  cruelty  of  it  all.   Also  the  other  scene,   where  Salvatore  and  the  nomadic peasant  girl,  are  captured   and  accused  of  being  Satan’s  agents,   just  due  to  the  presence  of  the  black cat  and  candles.   What  the  director  is  showing  here,  is  the  way  certain  people   who  were  not normal,  were  branded  as  agents  of  the  Devil  during  the  medieval  times,   and  then  made  the  scapegoats.   Salvatore  was a hunchback,  and  not  of  sane mind,   the  girl,  was  a nomadic  peasant, half  wild,  both  of   them  not  belonging  to  the  normal  society.  Their  fate  was  similiar  to  the  millions  of  those  killed  during  the  Inquisition.

Another  interesting  scene  is   where  William  deduces  the background  of   Salvatore  and  his mentor  Remigio.   Adso  first  meets  Salvatore, but  is  unable  to  make  out  what  he speaks.   It is  again  William,   who  deduces  that  based  on  the  word  Penitenziagite,   which  was  the motto  of  a sub  sect  called   dolcinites.    Though  both  the  Francisans  and Dolcinites,   believed  that  Christ  was  poor, and  so his followers should  lead  an  asectic  life,   the  Dolcinites  believed  that  the  rich  should  not  actually exist,  and went  about  killing  them.   Contrary  to  what  most  people  say,   there  is  a difference between   being  religious  and  being  fundamentalist.  A  deeply  religious  person  will follow  the scriptures  of  his  religion  to  the point,  but  he   keeps  his  beliefs  to  himself.   It  is  the  fundamentalists  who  are  more  dangerous  as  they believe  that   every  one  around  must  follow  their  beliefs  or  be  slaugthered,   the  Nazis  and  the  Talibans  being  the  best  example.  As  William  says

You see, Adso, the step between ecstatic vision and sinful frenzy is all too brief.

Another  well  directed  scene  is   where   William  takes  on  his  erstwhile  rival  Bernardo  Gui  in  court.   After  torturing  Salvatore,  Gui  makes him  confess  his  crimes  in  a  kangaroo  court.  Remigio,  though  adamant  at  first,   confesses  everything when  Gui  threatens  to torture him.    William  believes   in  reasoning and deduction,   Gui  however  believes  that  only  torture  can  make  people  confess  the truth.  The  key  to   Gui’s   character  comes  later  in  the  movie,  when  during  a showdown  with  one  of   the  monks he  says

Laughter kills fear, and without fear there can be no faith because without fear of the Devil, there is no more need of God.

Fear  is  what  both   Gui   and   the  monks  dominate  over  the  peasantry  in  different  ways.   Gui   seeks  to  stamp  his authority   using the  fear  of   torture,   the  way  he  gets  Remigio  to  confess  everything.    The  monks   believe  that  its  only  the  fear  of  the  unknown,  that  keeps  people   devout.    The  fact  that  the  Church  wielded  such  enormous  power  for  centuries  over  the lives  of   the  common people,  is  really  scary. In  fact  during  one  of   the  initial   scenes,  we  see  that  the peasants  in  the  village   live  off the  scraps  of  food thrown  down by the abbey.   It  is  the  peasants  again   who  rise  in  revolt  against   Gui  later. 

Another   interesting  scene  in  the  movie,  is  when  Adso  confesses  to  Wiliam,  that  he is  love  with  the  nomad  girl.   The  dialogue between  Adso  and  William   over  love,  is  beautifully  structured.    When Adso  asks  William  what he thinks  ,  his  reply is

Well, of course I don’t have the benefit of your experience, but I find it difficult to convince myself that God would have introduced such a foul being into creation without endowing her with some virtures. Hmm? How peaceful life would be without love, Adso, how safe, how tranquil, and how dull.

If  you  love  murder  mysteries,   this  is  a  movie  to be  watched.   But  you  would  need  to have  some  knowledge  of  medieval  churches and  14th  century  scholastic  thought  to  understand  the  movie.  If  you  had  read  the  novel,  the  movie  would  seem  to be a  diluted  version of  it,  but   again  the  philosophizing  and  sermonizing  would  not  be  as  effective  in  the  movie  as   the  novel. 

Sean  Connery  perfectly   fits  the  role  of    William,  and  in  fact  one  of  the  main  strengths  of   the  movie.   He  effortlesly  essays  the  role  of   William,   though  his  Scottish  accent  does  stand  out  at  times.     F.  Murray  Abraham   proves  an  able  foil  to  him as  the  ruthless Bernardo Gui,   wonderfully  conveying  the  cruelty,  the  wickedness,  the  arrogance.  Christian  Slater,   does  a fairly  good  job  as  Adso, while   Ron  Perlman’s  performance  as   the  demented  hunchback  Salvatore  has  a  touch of  pathos to it.

Tags: Aristotle, Medieval Europe, Mystery Movies, sean connery, Sherlock Holmes, Umberto Eco, William of Baskerville, World Cinema
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share this Blog!   »    Tweet This!
  •     Facebook
  •     MySpace
  •     Digg it!
  •     Add to Delicious!
  •     Stumble it
  •     Print this article!

Related Posts

-  Sherlock Holmes is back….
-  Sherlock Holmes : New Images
-  La vie en rose (2007) : A review
-  I Never Promised You a Rose Garden…
-  Sherlock Jr.
-  The Number 23 (2007)
-  Film-o-meter
-  Paraque V'­a : Man can live like a machine but what to do with mind?
-  Gulaal Review- Indian cinema is freed.
-  The Graduate – Dustin Hoffman Movie

12 Comments

  1. mayurica mayurica says:

    what a co-incidence. Ive just starting reading the novel… done almost 100 pages… meaning to get hold of the film once i’m done with the book…and here u’ve just written out a lovely piece on the film. very nice. without spoilers too! looking fwd to completing the book and getting onto the film. its quite a serious read though!thanks.

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Mayurica, do check out the movie, but changes have been made from the novel. The book covers a lot of issues related to empirical thought, medieval scholasticism, abbeys, philosophy, the movie version however concentrates mostly on the murder mystery part. Thankfully the core issues have not been dumbed down much, and above all there is good ole Connery.

      UA:F [1.7.5_995]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  2. Hi Ratnakar,
    How come you always write reviews movie I love,
    Great stuff,
    I captured movie stills of this particular film for the reference for the comic book, regarding Gothic stuff.

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Hmm Shekhar, i guess we have some kind of kindred spirit, we seem to love the same kinda movies. This movie has some of the best Gothic shots, especially the gloomy atmosphere of the abbey.

      UA:F [1.7.5_995]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  3. jitaditya jitaditya says:

    I saw the film sometime ago…excellent performances…and they were able to create a gothic, macabre setting that enhances the impact…

    I think the film concentrates rightly on the mystery part of the novel…otherwise Eco’s novel contains extremely long descriptions of various aspects of the abbey and its life which is a good read but definitely not suitable for films…

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Jitaditya, yes actually the movie adaptation makes sense in that way. Its not possible to fit in all those descriptions of the abbey, the scholastic processes into the framework of a movie. The setting has that eerie Gothic feel, though i felt at times, the darkness angle was overdone. There were some shots, where i just could not make out what was happening. Anyway good ole Sean Connery is always there to make it up, one of the finest actors for sure.

      UA:F [1.7.5_995]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  4. Satyendra Jha Satyendra Jha says:

    good insightful post ratnakar. havent watched the movie, not read the book. but now, i plan to do both,and at the earliest.

    thx for the hint…

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Satyen, yes do check out the movie and book, but there are differences between both, so you need to be prepared for it. It is nowadays regularly shown on UTV World movies, so you can catch it there.

      UA:F [1.7.5_995]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  5. sharath sharath says:

    Would like to watch the film … have read the book and found to be excellant..Hope Orhan Pamuk’s ‘My name is red’ which is also some what on similar lines would be made into a film..

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Sharath, the movie version is slightly different from the novel. But then its expected, because the novel, has a lot of passages about abbeys, medieval philosophy, scholasticism, empirical thought, which can’t be captured in the movie. The movie concentrates more on the murder mystery angle, and how William makes his deductions, so you need to see from that angle. But overally a very good adaptation, something which Ron Howard failed badly with Da Vinci Code.

      UA:F [1.7.5_995]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  6. Satyendra Jha Satyendra Jha says:

    ratnakar, thx for the info. btw, plz do let me know whenever this is scheduled next on UTV World movies. hope u dont mind.

    wud luv to catch it asap.

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  7. Anshul Anshul says:

    I ve been like looking for the movie for some time now and last night i got to see only the first 30 minutes of it, plan to see it more now after your blog!!Gr8 description of scenes, very highly rated!!!

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Leave a Reply

:) :lol: :rofl: :banginghead: :witsend: :yahoo: :wacko: :bow: :glasses: :notsure: :roll: 8-O :twisted: :cry: :cool: more »